The Efficacy and Methodological Challenges of Psychotherapy for Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review
Abstract
Adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at a greater risk of anxiety and depression and impaired quality of life (QoL) compared with healthy controls and other chronic physical illness groups. Consequently, the development and evaluation of well-defined and theoretically robust psychotherapeutic interventions for adults with IBD are desirable. To date, interventions have, for the most part, used multiple cross-theoretical approaches. Published reviews are heterogeneous in terms both of categorization of psychotherapeutic approaches and also of conclusions relating to efficacy. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found no evidence for the efficacy of these interventions in adults, as in a number of previous reviews, ideologically disparate interventions (e.g., psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral) were grouped together. We aimed to extend the currently available literature on psychological intervention in IBD by: evaluating the efficacy of specific strategies (i.e., stress management, psychodynamic, cognitive behavioral therapy, or hypnosis) in improving psychological symptoms and QoL, including all controlled and noncontrolled studies, and explicating the methodological problems in published trials. Sixteen studies (5 stress management, 4 psychodynamic, 5 cognitive behavioral therapy, and 2 hypnosis) were evaluated. Interventions predominantly based on stress management showed only modest benefits for IBD or mental health symptoms or QoL. Cognitive behavioral therapy studies showed generally consistent benefits in terms of anxiety and depression symptoms, but inconsistent outcomes regarding IBD symptoms. Psychodynamically informed interventions reduced depressive and anxiety symptoms, but not IBD severity. Both hypnosis studies, albeit using different methods, seemed to have a more positive impact on disease severity than mental health symptoms or QoL. Our results suggest that while further well-designed and evaluated interventions are needed, psychological input can make a positive contribution to best practice multidisciplinary treatment of adults with IBD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current evidence around the efficacy of different types of psychotherapy for IBD is mixed, and questions remain about what types of support might be most effective.
“Current evidence around the efficacy of different types of psychotherapy is mixed and there remain questions around what types of support might be most effective in improving patient outcomes for those with IBD (Ballou & Keefer, 2017; Gracie et al., 2017; Knowles et al., 2013).”
From Moving Towards Acceptance and Values: A Qualitative Study of ACTforIBD Compared to IBD Psychoeducation (2024) · cites this paper as Knowles et al., 2013
Many studies of psychological interventions in IBD have poor methodological rigor and reporting.
“Many studies are observed to be non-randomized, devoid of inclusion and exclusion criteria, neglect to report salient participant data (e.g., IBD type), and neglect to report sufficient intervention program detail [18,19,20,21].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Knowles, S. R., Monshat, K., & Castle, D. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2704-2715
- ISSN
- 1078-0998 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2327496472
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- inflammatory bowel disease, psychotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Clinical Protocols, Humans, Prognosis, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review