Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Study

Open access
Paul, Stephane, Del Tedesco, Emilie, Marotte, Hubert, Rinaudo-Gaujous, Melanie, Moreau, Amelie, Phelip, Jean-Marc, Genin, Christian, Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent, Roblin, Xavier·2013·Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on the value of therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab (IFX) to predict mucosal healing (MH) in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are scarce. METHODS: All consecutive patients with IBD receiving ongoing IFX (5 mg/kg) treatment and developing secondary failure to IFX were enrolled in a prospective study between June 2010 and May 2011. IFX trough levels, antibodies to IFX concentrations, C-reactive protein levels, and fecal calprotectin were measured before IFX optimization and at week 8. A proctosigmoidoscopy was performed on the day of first IFX optimization and at week 8 in all patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). MH was defined by fecal calprotectin <250 μg/g stools in Crohn's disease (CD) and by an endoscopic Mayo score of 0 or 1 in UC. RESULTS: This study included 52 patients with IBD: 34 patients with CD (mean Crohn's Disease Activity Index, 300; mean C-reactive protein, 28 ± 10 mg/L; mean fecal calprotectin, 705 ± 300 μg/g) and 18 patients with UC (mean Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index, 7; mean Mayo endoscopic score, 3). After IFX dose intensification, half of CD and UC patients achieved MH. Increase in IFX trough levels (called "delta IFX" in micrograms per milliliter) was associated with MH in both CD and UC (P = 0.001). A delta IFX >0.5 μg/mL was associated with MH (sensitivity [se], 0.88; specificity [sp], 0.77; P = 0.0001, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.89). On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with MH after IFX optimization was a delta IFX >0.5 µg/mL (likelihood ratio = 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.08; P = 0.048) in patients with IBD. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic drug monitoring of IFX strongly predicts the likelihood of achieving MH following IFX dose intensification in both CD and UC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mib.0b013e3182a77b41

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Paul, S., Del Tedesco, E., Marotte, H., Rinaudo-Gaujous, M., Moreau, A., Phelip, J.-M., Genin, C., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., & Roblin, X.
Venue
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Published
2013-11
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
2568-2576
ISSN
1078-0998 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088135039
Cited by
222
References
0
FWCI
15.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mib.0b013e3182a77b41
The paper
Paul, S., Del Tedesco, E., Marotte, H., Rinaudo-Gaujous, M., Moreau, A., Phelip, J.-M., Genin, C., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., & Roblin, X. (2013). Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Study. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1097/mib.0b013e3182a77b41

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.