Cited by 45Survey Methodology and NonresponseCensus and Population EstimationMedical Coding and Health Information

Indirect estimation of race ethnicity for survey respondents who do not report race/ethnicity

Abstract

Background: Researchers are increasingly interested in measuring race/ethnicity, but some survey respondents skip race/ethnicity items. Objectives: The main objectives of this study were to investigate the extent to which racial/ethnic groups differ in skipping race/ethnicity survey items, the degree to which this reflects reluctance to disclose race/ethnicity, and the utility of imputing missing race/ethnicity. Research Design: We applied a previously developed method for imputing race/ethnicity from administrative data (Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname and Geocoding 2.0) to data from a national survey where race/ethnicity was usually self-reported, but was sometimes missing. A linear mixed-effects regression model predicted the probability of self-reporting race/ethnicity from imputed racial/ethnic probabilities. Subjects: In total, 508,497 Medicare beneficiaries responding to the 2013–2014 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys were included in this study. Measures: Self-reported race/ethnicity and estimated racial/ethnic probabilities. Results: Black beneficiaries were most likely to not self-report their race/ethnicity (6.6%), followed by Hispanic (4.7%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (4.7%) beneficiaries. Non-Hispanic whites were the least likely to skip these items (3.2%). The 3.7% overall rate of missingness is similar to adjacent demographic items. General patterns of item missingness rather than a specific reluctance to disclose race/ethnicity appears to explain the elevated rate of missing race/ethnicity among Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic beneficiaries and most but not all among Black beneficiaries. Adding imputed cases to the data set did not substantially alter the estimated overall racial/ethnic distribution, but it did modestly increase sample size and statistical power. Conclusions: It may be worthwhile to impute race/ethnicity when this information is unavailable in survey data sets due to item nonresponse, especially when missingness is high.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001011

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most widely researched imputation method was Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG).

    “The most widely researched imputation method was Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG).22,45,46,50,65”
  • Several studies looked at the use of imputation to increase the completeness of datasets and avoid casewise deletion.

    “Several studies looked at the use of imputation, also referred to as indirect estimation, to increase the completeness of datasets and avoid casewise deletion.14,22,30,45,46,50,61,65,67–70”
  • Dembosky et al found that BISG did not substantially alter the estimated overall racial/ethnic distribution, but it did modestly increase sample size and statistical power.

    “In their study on the use of BISG, Dembosky et al46 found that it “did not substantially alter the estimated overall racial/ethnic distribution, but it did modestly increase sample size and statistical power.””
  • Ten of these (66%) identified that the incomplete data led to validity issues, most commonly that these data were not missing at random and had the potential to introduce bias.

    “Ten of these (66%) identified that the incomplete data led to validity issues, most commonly that these data were not missing at random and had the potential to introduced bias.12,34,43–50”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dembosky, J. W., Haviland, A. M., Haas, A., Hambarsoomian, K., Weech-Maldonado, R., Wilson-Frederick, S. M., Gaillot, S., & Elliott, M. N.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Minority Health
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (US)
Corresponding author
  • Dembosky, Jacob W.
  • Haviland, Amelia M.
  • Haas, Ann
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2019-05
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
e28-e33
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905214067
Cited by
45
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
Medicare beneficiaries
MeSH terms
Aged, Bayes Theorem, Ethnicity, Female, Forms and Records Control, Medicare, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review