Cited by 1Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentHealthcare Policy and ManagementSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Prevalence of Buprenorphine Providers Requiring Cash Payment From Insured Women Seeking Opioid Use Disorder Treatment

Open access
Richards, Michael R., Leech, Ashley A., Stein, Bradley D., Buntin, Melinda B., Patrick, Stephen W.·2023·Medical Care

Abstract

Context: Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) are known to be effective, especially in reducing the risk of overdose death. Yet, many individuals suffering from OUD are not receiving treatment. One potential barrier can be the patient’s ability to access providers through their insurance plans. Data and Methods: We used an audit (simulated patient) study methodology to examine appointment-granting behavior by buprenorphine prescribers in 10 different US states. Trained callers posed as women with OUD and were randomly assigned Medicaid or private insurance status. Callers request an OUD treatment appointment and then asked whether they would be able to use their insurance to cover the cost of care, or alternatively, whether they would be required to pay fully out-of-pocket. Findings: We found that Medicaid and privately insured women were often asked to pay cash for OUD treatment––40% of the time over the full study sample. Such buprenorphine provider requests happened more than 60% of the time in some states. Areas with more providers or with more generous provider payments were not obviously more willing to accept the patient’s insurance benefits for OUD treatment. Rural providers were less likely to require payment in cash in order for the woman to receive care. Conclusions: State-to-state variation was the most striking pattern in our field experiment data. The wide variation suggests that women of reproductive age with OUD in certain states face even greater challenges to treatment access than perhaps previously thought; however, it also reveals that some states have found ways to curtail this problem. Our findings encourage greater attention to this public health challenge and possibly opportunities for shared learning across states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001851

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that 43.0% of SUD service utilizations were self-pay is consistent with documented barriers to SUD treatment, including lack of insurance, inadequate coverage benefits, cash-only payment acceptance, and patients' self-pay preference due to stigma-related privacy concerns.

    “our finding that 43.0% of SUD service utilizations were self-pay is consistent with documented barriers to SUD treatment, including lack of insurance,24 inadequate coverage benefits across various insurance types,24, 31-36 cash-only payment acceptance (i.e., non-acceptance of any insurance) by SUD treatment providers,36 and patients’ self-pay preference due to stigma-related privacy concerns.24”

    From County-Level Variation in Substance Use Disorder Service Utilization by Insurance Payers and Self-Pay in the United States (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [2]Sordo L, Barrio G, Bravo MJ, Indave BI, Degenhardt L, Wiessing L, Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ [Internet]. 2017 Apr 26 [ cited 2021 Sep 5]; 357: j1550. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/357/bmj.j1550 28446428 PMC5421454
  2. [3]National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives [Internet]. Mancher M, Leshner AI, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2019 [ cited 2021 Jun 28]. (The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538936/ 30896911
  3. [4]Jones CM, McCance-Katz EF. Co-occurring substance use and mental disorders among adults with opioid use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Apr 1; 197: 78– 82. 30784952
  4. [5]Williams AR, Nunes EV, Bisaga A, Levin FR, Olfson M. Development of a Cascade of Care for Responding to the Opioid Epidemic. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse [Internet]. 2019 [ cited 2021 Jun 28]; 45(1): 1– 10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404749/ 30675818 PMC6404749
  5. [6]McBain RK, Dick A, Sorbero M, Stein BD. Growth and Distribution of Buprenorphine-Waivered Providers in the United States, 2007–2017. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 7; 172(7): 504– 6. 31905379 PMC7217729
  6. [7]Wakeman SE, Barnett ML. Primary Care and the Opioid-Overdose Crisis - Buprenorphine Myths and Realities. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 5; 379(1): 1– 4. 29972748
  7. [8]Hutchinson E, Catlin M, Andrilla CHA, Baldwin LM, Rosenblatt RA. Barriers to primary care physicians prescribing buprenorphine. Ann Fam Med. 2014 Apr; 12(2): 128– 33. 24615308 PMC3948759
  8. [9]Huhn AS, Dunn KE. Why aren’t physicians prescribing more buprenorphine? J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Jul; 78: 1– 7. 28554597 PMC5524453
  9. [10]Brondani MA, Alan R, Donnelly L. Stigma of addiction and mental illness in healthcare: The case of patients’ experiences in dental settings. PloS One. 2017; 12(5): e0177388. 28531176 PMC5439661
  10. [11]Patrick SW, Richards MR, Dupont WD, McNeer E, Buntin MB, Martin PR, Association of Pregnancy and Insurance Status With Treatment Access for Opioid Use Disorder. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3; 3(8): e2013456. 32797175 PMC7428808
  11. [12]Beetham T, Saloner B, Wakeman SE, Gaye M, Barnett ML. Access to Office-Based Buprenorphine Treatment in Areas With High Rates of Opioid-Related Mortality: An Audit Study. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2019 Jul 2 [ cited 2021 Aug 24]; 171(1): 1. Available from: 10.7326/M18-3457 31158849 PMC7164610 · DOI
  12. [14]Parran TV, Muller JZ, Chernyak E, Adelman C, Delos Reyes CM, Rowland D, Access to and Payment for Office-Based Buprenorphine Treatment in Ohio. Subst Abuse Res Treat [Internet]. 2017 Jun 13 [ cited 2022 Mar 1];11:1178221817699247. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473522/ PMC5473522 28642642
  13. [15]Knudsen HK, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL, Havens JR, Studts JL. Physicians’ Decision-making When Implementing Buprenorphine with New Patients: Conjoint Analyses of Data from a Cohort of Current Prescribers. J Addict Med [Internet]. 2018 [ cited 2022 Mar 1]; 12(1): 31– 9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786469/ 28914663 PMC5786469
  14. [16]Wisniewski AM, Dlugosz MR, Blondell RD. Reimbursement and Practice Policies Among Providers of Buprenorphine-Naloxone Treatment. Subst Abuse [Internet]. 2013 Apr [ cited 2022 Mar 1]; 34(2): 105– 7. Available from: 10.1080/08897077.2012.677753 23577902 · DOI
  15. [19]Schranz AJ, Barrett J, Hurt CB, Malvestutto C, Miller WC. Challenges Facing a Rural Opioid Epidemic: Treatment and Prevention of HIV and Hepatitis C. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep [Internet]. 2018 Jun 1 [ cited 2021 Aug 24]; 15(3): 245– 54. Available from: 10.1007/s11904-018-0393-0 29796965 PMC6085134 · DOI
  16. [20]Havens JR, Walsh SL, Korthuis PT, Fiellin DA. Implementing Treatment of Opioid-Use Disorder in Rural Settings: a Focus on HIV and Hepatitis C Prevention and Treatment. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep [Internet]. 2018 Aug 1 [ cited 2021 Aug 24]; 15(4): 315– 23. Available from: 10.1007/s11904-018-0402-3 29948609 PMC6260984 · DOI
  17. [22]Decker SL. Two-Thirds Of Primary Care Physicians Accepted New Medicaid Patients In 2011–12: A Baseline To Measure Future Acceptance Rates. Health Aff (Millwood) [Internet]. 2013 Jul 1 [ cited 2021 Aug 30]; 32(7): 1183– 7. Available from: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0361 23836732 · DOI
  18. [23]Neprash HT, Zink A, Gray J, Hempstead K. Physicians’ Participation In Medicaid Increased Only Slightly Following Expansion. Health Aff (Millwood) [Internet]. 2018 Jul [ cited 2021 Aug 30]; 37(7): 1087– 91. Available from: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1085 29985702 PMC12512244 · DOI
  19. [24]Sommers BD, Kronick R. Measuring Medicaid Physician Participation Rates and Implications for Policy. J Health Polit Policy Law [Internet]. 2016 Apr 1 [ cited 2021 Aug 30]; 41(2): 211– 24. Available from: 10.1215/03616878-3476117 26732320 · DOI
  20. [25]Decker SL. No Association Found Between The Medicaid Primary Care Fee Bump And Physician-Reported Participation In Medicaid. Health Aff (Millwood) [Internet]. 2018 Jul [ cited 2021 Aug 30]; 37(7): 1092– 8. Available from: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0078 29985691 · DOI
  21. [26]Richards MR, Saloner B, Kenney GM, Rhodes KV, Polsky D. Availability of New Medicaid Patient Appointments and the Role of Rural Health Clinics. Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2016 [ cited 2021 Aug 30]; 51(2): 570– 91. Available from: 10.1111/1475-6773.12334 26119695 PMC4799893 · DOI
  22. [27]Bronstein JM, Adams EK. Rural-Urban Differences in Health Risks, Resource Use and Expenditures Within Three State Medicaid Programs: Implications for Medicaid Managed Care. J Rural Health [Internet]. 2002 [ cited 2021 Aug 30]; 18(1): 38– 48. Available from: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2002.tb00875.x 12043754 · DOI
  23. [28]Long SK, King J, Coughlin TA. The Health Care Experiences of Rural Medicaid Beneficiaries. J Health Care Poor Underserved [Internet]. 2006 Aug [ cited 2021 Aug 30]; 17(3): 575– 91. Available from: http://www.proquest.com/docview/220585987/abstract/542D513486BD42C8PQ/1 16960323

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richards, M. R., Leech, A. A., Stein, B. D., Buntin, M. B., & Patrick, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Department of Health Policy
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Richards, Michael R.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2023-04-21
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
377-383
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366603207
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA045800, K01DA050740, R01DA045729)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
opioid use disorder, buprenorphine, insurance coverage, Medicaid, private insurance, women of reproductive age, treatment access, state-to-state variation
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Buprenorphine, Female, Humans, Medicaid, Opioid-Related Disorders, United States, Prevalence, Opiate Substitution Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review