Evaluation of the Washington State Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Project: Cost Outcomes for Medicaid Patients Screened in Hospital Emergency Departments
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Substance abuse is a major determinant of morbidity, mortality, and health care resource consumption. We evaluated a screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) program, implemented in 9 hospital emergency departments (ED) in Washington State. METHODS: Working-age, disabled Medicaid patients who were screened and received a brief intervention (BI) from April 12, 2004 through September 30, 2006 were included in the study's intervention group (N = 1557). The comparison group (N = 1557), constructed using (one-to-one) propensity score matching, consisted of Medicaid patients who received care in one of the counties in which an intervention hospital ED was located but who did not receive a BI. We estimated difference-in-difference (DiD) regression models to assess the effects of the SBIRT program for different patient groups. RESULTS: The SBIRT program was associated with an estimated reduction in Medicaid costs per member per month of $366 (P = 0.05) for all patients, including patients who received a referral for chemical dependency (CD) treatment. For patients who received a BI only and had no CD treatment in the year before or the year after the ED visit, the estimated reduction in Medicaid per member per month costs was $542 (P = 0.06). The SBIRT program was also associated with decreased inpatient utilization (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: SBIRT programs have potential to limit resource consumption among working-age, disabled Medicaid patients. The hospital ED seems especially well suited for SBIRT programs given the large number of injured patients treated in the ED and the fact that many conditions treated are related to substance abuse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SBIRT approach has been shown to be effective in a variety of clinical settings, such as primary care offices and emergency rooms.
“The SBIRT approach has been shown to be effective in a variety of clinical settings, such as primary care offices and emergency rooms.16”
From A Behavioral Health Program for Alcohol Use Disorder, Substance Abuse, and Depression in Chronic Liver Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Estee, S., Wickizer, T., He, L., Shah, M. F., & Mancuso, D.
- Affiliations
- Washington Department of Social and Health Services (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Estee, Sharon
- He, Lijian
- Shah, Melissa Ford
- Mancuso, David
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-24
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012111243
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Keywords
- SBIRT, substance abuse, emergency department, Medicaid, health care costs, inpatient utilization, chemical dependency treatment, program evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Costs and Cost Analysis, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospital Bed Capacity, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Male, Mass Screening, Medicaid, Middle Aged, Referral and Consultation, Sex Factors, United States, Washington, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review