Cited by 81Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Evaluation of the Washington State Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Project: Cost Outcomes for Medicaid Patients Screened in Hospital Emergency Departments

Estee, Sharon, Wickizer, Thomas, He, Lijian, Shah, Melissa Ford, Mancuso, David·2010·Medical Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substance abuse is a major determinant of morbidity, mortality, and health care resource consumption. We evaluated a screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) program, implemented in 9 hospital emergency departments (ED) in Washington State. METHODS: Working-age, disabled Medicaid patients who were screened and received a brief intervention (BI) from April 12, 2004 through September 30, 2006 were included in the study's intervention group (N = 1557). The comparison group (N = 1557), constructed using (one-to-one) propensity score matching, consisted of Medicaid patients who received care in one of the counties in which an intervention hospital ED was located but who did not receive a BI. We estimated difference-in-difference (DiD) regression models to assess the effects of the SBIRT program for different patient groups. RESULTS: The SBIRT program was associated with an estimated reduction in Medicaid costs per member per month of $366 (P = 0.05) for all patients, including patients who received a referral for chemical dependency (CD) treatment. For patients who received a BI only and had no CD treatment in the year before or the year after the ED visit, the estimated reduction in Medicaid per member per month costs was $542 (P = 0.06). The SBIRT program was also associated with decreased inpatient utilization (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: SBIRT programs have potential to limit resource consumption among working-age, disabled Medicaid patients. The hospital ED seems especially well suited for SBIRT programs given the large number of injured patients treated in the ED and the fact that many conditions treated are related to substance abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181bd498f

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 81

Authors
Estee, S., Wickizer, T., He, L., Shah, M. F., & Mancuso, D.
Affiliations
  • Washington Department of Social and Health Services (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Estee, Sharon
  • He, Lijian
  • Shah, Melissa Ford
  • Mancuso, David
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2010-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
18-24
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012111243
Cited by
81
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
SBIRT, substance abuse, emergency department, Medicaid, health care costs, inpatient utilization, chemical dependency treatment, program evaluation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Costs and Cost Analysis, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospital Bed Capacity, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Male, Mass Screening, Medicaid, Middle Aged, Referral and Consultation, Sex Factors, United States, Washington, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review