Cited by 20Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesAcute Kidney Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Healthy and unhealthy aging on kidney structure and function: human studies

Open access
Denic, Aleksandar, Rule, Andrew D., Glassock, Richard J.·2022·Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review is intended to provide an up-to-date analysis of the structural and functional alterations of the kidneys that accompany healthy and unhealthy aging in humans. Macro- and micro- structural changes and glomerular filtration rate (whole kidney and single nephron) accompanying aging will be stressed. Recent findings: Comparative findings concerning distribution of anatomic changes of the kidney healthy and unhealthy aging are reviewed. Challenges concerning definition of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in otherwise healthy aging patients are discussed. The complex interactions of CKD and aging are discussed. The role of podocyte dysbiosis in kidney aging is reviewed. Summary: Kidney aging is a complex phenomenon often difficult to distinguish from CKD. Nonetheless, phenotypes of healthy and unhealthy aging are evident. Much more information concerning the molecular characteristics of normal kidney aging and its relevance to chronic kidney disease is needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000780

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 72 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Denic, A., Rule, A. D., & Glassock, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension
Published
2022-01-25
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
228-234
ISSN
  • 1062-4821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-6543
OpenAlex
W4207071407
Cited by
20
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK090358)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
kidney aging, healthy aging, chronic kidney disease, glomerular filtration rate, nephron, kidney structure, single nephron glomerular filtration rate
MeSH terms
Aging, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney, Male, Podocytes, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review