Cited by 108Gastrointestinal motility and disordersCongenital gastrointestinal and neural anomaliesNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Enteric nervous system: reflexes, pattern generators and motility

Wood, Jackie D·2008·Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Abstract

Purpose of review Advances in understanding of the enteric nervous system (ENS) support the brain-in-the-gut concept. Progress relative to sensory neurons, reflex circuits and central pattern generators is summarized. Recent findings A 'hardwired' polysynaptic circuit in the ENS evokes descending inhibition of the intestinal circular muscle below an activation point, and contraction of the muscle above the activation point. This circuit occupies the lowest complexity level of the hierarchical organization of neural motility control. Networks in the ENS contain central pattern generators, which activate the 'hardwired' basic circuit in recurrent fashion to generate motility patterns linked with intestinal secretion. Summary The dogma that muscle responses seen when the investigator stretches the intestinal wall or stimulates the mucosa reflect a classic reflex can be challenged. No limb equivalent to the afferent limb of a spinal motor reflex has been identified unequivocally in the ENS. Central pattern generators are neural circuits, which generate organized and repetitive motor patterns independent of their sensory input. Central pattern generators rather than afferent-evoked reflexes are postulated to be responsible for the patterns of propulsive contractile behavior and secretion, which recur rhythmically when distension is maintained above threshold or during mucosal application of nutrients or paracrine mediators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mog.0b013e3282f56125

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ENS is believed to be more analogous to the CNS than other networks within the peripheral nervous system.

    “Due to the organization and structure of the number, morphology, and neurochemical nature of the ENS networks within the ANS, it is believed to be more analogous to the CNS than other networks within the peripheral nervous system (Gershon, 2018;Timmermans et al., 1997;Wood, 2008Wood, , 2016)).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Wood, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, J. D.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wood, Jackie D
Venue
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Published
2008-03
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
149-158
ISSN
0267-1379 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065539667
Cited by
108
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
enteric nervous system, central pattern generator, intestinal motility, sensory neurons, gut-brain axis, descending inhibition, circular muscle contraction, intestinal secretion, neural circuits
MeSH terms
Humans, Intestines, Reflex, Enteric Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review