CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationSinusitis and nasal conditions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surgical options for the allergic rhinitis patient

Chhabra, Nipun, Houser, Steven M.·2012·Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery
DOI 10.1097/moo.0b013e328352b821
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose of review Allergic rhinitis is a very common disorder that affects millions of patients annually and the hallmark complaint of nasal obstruction significantly impacts the quality of life. Many surgical options exist for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, directed primarily at the underlying nasal obstructive component. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss the various surgical modalities and their historical efficacy. Recent findings Much of the literature has focused on reduction of the inferior turbinate for symptomatic improvement in patients afflicted with allergic rhinitis. Endoscopic sinus surgery and septoplasty play little role in the management of allergic rhinitis, unless when seen in conjunction with other conditions such as rhinosinusitis. Summary Although no single modality has evolved as the gold standard for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, the mainstay of surgical intervention targets the inferior turbinate. It is very important for the otolaryngologist to be familiar with an armamentarium of surgical techniques.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/moo.0b013e328352b821

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surgical treatment improves nasal permeability in certain cases of rhinitis with turbinate hypertrophy when pharmacological treatment maintained for at least 3 months has failed.

    “In certain cases of rhinitis with turbinate hypertrophy, surgical treatment has been shown to improve nasal permeability when pharmacological treatment maintained for at least 3 months has failed [134,188-190].”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [190]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Beasley, 1998, Lancet, 351, 1225, 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07302-9 · DOI
  2. Nathan, 2008, Allergy Asthma Proc, 29, 600, 10.2500/aap.2008.29.3179 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Krause, 2003, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 128, 14, 10.1067/mhn.2003.3 · DOI
  4. Trevino, 1993, ENT J, 72, 116
  5. Lin, 2010, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 136, 892, 10.1001/archoto.2010.135 · DOI
  6. Aksoy, 2010, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 143, 579, 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.06.915 · DOI
  7. Passali, 1999, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 108, 569, 10.1177/000348949910800608 · DOI
  8. OFlynn, 1990, J Laryngol Otol, 104, 239, 10.1017/S002221510011237X · DOI
  9. Volk, 2010, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 136, 1015, 10.1001/archoto.2010.161 · DOI
  10. Wolfson, 1996, J Clin Laser Med Surg, 13, 81, 10.1089/clm.1996.14.81 · DOI
  11. Chang, 2004, Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 12, 53, 10.1097/00020840-200402000-00015 · DOI
  12. Elwany, 1999, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 120, 742, 10.1053/hn.1999.v120.a91894 · DOI
  13. Fukutake, 1987, AORN J, 46, 756, 10.1016/S0001-2092(07)66507-7 · DOI
  14. Olszewska, 2010, Folia Histochem Cytobiol, 48, 217, 10.2478/v10042-010-0049-4 · DOI
  15. Chusakul, 2011, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 144, 237, 10.1177/0194599810390448 · DOI
  16. Caffier, 2011, Lasers Med Sci, 26, 57, 10.1007/s10103-010-0813-x · DOI
  17. Chhabra, 2011, Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 44, 779, 10.1016/j.otc.2011.03.007 · DOI
  18. Havel, 2011, Lasers Surg Med, 43, 881, 10.1002/lsm.21128 · DOI
  19. Hytonen, 2009, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 266, 1257, 10.1007/s00405-009-0914-y · DOI
  20. Oyake, 2004, Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho, 107, 695, 10.3950/jibiinkoka.107.695 · DOI
  21. Lee, 2006, Laryngoscope, 116, 729, 10.1097/01.mlg.0000205140.44181.45 · DOI
  22. Cingi, 2010, Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 30, 138
  23. Powell, 2001, Laryngoscope, 111, 1783, 10.1097/00005537-200110000-00023 · DOI
  24. Garzaro, 2010, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 143, 348, 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.06.908 · DOI
  25. Di Rienzo Businco, 2010, Rhinology, 48, 174, 10.4193/Rhin09.149 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Simeon, 2010, Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 127, 77, 10.1016/j.anorl.2010.04.004 · DOI
  27. Chhabra, 2009, Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 42, 311, 10.1016/j.otc.2009.02.001 · DOI
  28. Mori, 2002, Laryngoscope, 112, 865, 10.1097/00005537-200205000-00016 · DOI
  29. Chen, 2008, Laryngoscope, 118, 1270, 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816d728e · DOI
  30. El Henawi Del, 2011, ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 73, 151, 10.1159/000327607 · DOI
  31. Stoksted, 1983, J Laryngol Otol, 97, 49, 10.1017/S0022215100093798 · DOI
  32. Fjermedal, 1988, J Laryngol Otol, 102, 796, 10.1017/S0022215100106486 · DOI
  33. Kim, 2011, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 145, 910, 10.1177/0194599811424119 · DOI
  34. Karatzanis, 2009, Rhinology, 47, 444
  35. Topal, 2011, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 268, 231, 10.1007/s00405-010-1323-y · DOI
  36. Cottle, 1948, Eye Ear Nose Throat, 27, 403
  37. Konno, 2010, Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, 10, 105, 10.1007/s11882-010-0093-3 · DOI
  38. Golding-Wood, 1961, J Laryngol Otol, 75, 232, 10.1017/S0022215100057716 · DOI
  39. Sadanaga, 1989, Auris Nasus Larynx, 16, S53, 10.1016/S0385-8146(89)80030-6 · DOI
  40. Su, 2011, Am J Rhinol Allergy, 25, 217, 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3704 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chhabra, N., & Houser, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
  • MetroHealth (US)
Corresponding author
Houser, Steven M.
ORCID
Chhabra, Nipun
Venue
Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2012-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
199-204
ISSN
1068-9508 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/moo.0b013e328352b821
OpenAlex
W2024850038
Cited by
23
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
allergic rhinitis, inferior turbinate reduction, nasal obstruction, endoscopic sinus surgery, septoplasty, sinusitis, quality of life
MeSH terms
Debridement, Endoscopy, Humans, Microsurgery, Nasal Mucosa, Nasal Septum, Paranasal Sinuses, Sensory Receptor Cells, Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, Sinusitis, Turbinates, Nasal Obstruction, Treatment Outcome, Autonomic Pathways, Laser Therapy, Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment, Rhinitis, Allergic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review