Cited by 124Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Confidentiality, consent, and caring for the adolescent patient

Berlan, Elise D, Bravender, Terrill·2009·Current Opinion in Pediatrics

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study reviews the healthcare-related rationale for providing confidential care to adolescents, as well as the legal framework for the provision of such care. RECENT FINDINGS: Physician assurances of confidentiality increase adolescents' willingness to disclose sensitive health information, but these assurances are rarely given. Physicians may not be aware of legal minor consent guidelines or may be concerned about parental reaction to such confidential discussions. Fortunately, many parents and teens understand the importance of confidential healthcare. Adolescent consent and confidentiality laws vary from state to state, but there are federal guidelines and common law concepts that are applicable throughout the United States. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule also provides guidelines for confidential care to minors. Future challenges for adolescent confidentiality include ease of access to electronic medical records as well as patient (and/or parent)-controlled health records. SUMMARY: Confidentiality for adolescents has important implications for the quality provision of healthcare for this vulnerable population. Physicians and other healthcare providers must be aware of these health implications, as well as federal policies, common law, and their individual state's laws pertaining to this important topic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mop.0b013e32832ce009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 124

Authors
Berlan, E. D., & Bravender, T.
Affiliations
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Berlan, Elise D
Venue
Current Opinion in Pediatrics
Published
2009-08
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
450-456
ISSN
1040-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038732192
Cited by
124
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
adolescent confidentiality, informed consent, adolescent patient, vulnerable populations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Medicine, Communication, Confidentiality, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Informed Consent, International Agencies, Parents, Physician-Patient Relations, Physician's Role, Professional-Family Relations, State Government, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Adolescent Health Services, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Government Regulation, Federal Government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review