Confidentiality, consent, and caring for the adolescent patient
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study reviews the healthcare-related rationale for providing confidential care to adolescents, as well as the legal framework for the provision of such care. RECENT FINDINGS: Physician assurances of confidentiality increase adolescents' willingness to disclose sensitive health information, but these assurances are rarely given. Physicians may not be aware of legal minor consent guidelines or may be concerned about parental reaction to such confidential discussions. Fortunately, many parents and teens understand the importance of confidential healthcare. Adolescent consent and confidentiality laws vary from state to state, but there are federal guidelines and common law concepts that are applicable throughout the United States. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule also provides guidelines for confidential care to minors. Future challenges for adolescent confidentiality include ease of access to electronic medical records as well as patient (and/or parent)-controlled health records. SUMMARY: Confidentiality for adolescents has important implications for the quality provision of healthcare for this vulnerable population. Physicians and other healthcare providers must be aware of these health implications, as well as federal policies, common law, and their individual state's laws pertaining to this important topic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In recent decades, state laws have given minors autonomy to consent to treatment for sensitive and private matters, such as sexually transmitted infections, alcohol or drug use, and mental health problems, which would preclude the need for parental consent.
“In recent decades, state laws have given minors autonomy to consent to treatment for sensitive and private matters, such as sexually transmitted infections, alcohol or drug use, and mental health problems, which would preclude the need for parental consent [82,83].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Berlan, E. D., & Bravender, T.
- Affiliations
- Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berlan, Elise D
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Pediatrics
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 450-456
- ISSN
- 1040-8703 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038732192
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- adolescent confidentiality, informed consent, adolescent patient, vulnerable populations
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Medicine, Communication, Confidentiality, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Informed Consent, International Agencies, Parents, Physician-Patient Relations, Physician's Role, Professional-Family Relations, State Government, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Adolescent Health Services, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Government Regulation, Federal Government
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review