Cited by 19Celiac Disease Research and ManagementChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesEosinophilic Esophagitis

Adherence to Gluten‐free Diet in a Celiac Pediatric Population Referred to the General Pediatrician After Remission

Sbravati, Francesca, Pagano, Sara, Retetangos, Cristiana, Spisni, Enzo, Bolasco, Giulia, Labriola, Flavio, Filardi, Maria C., Grondona, Ana G. +1 more·2020·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives Assessment of adherence to gluten-free diet in celiac disease (CD) is generally recommended. Few data are available about consequences of transition from the referral center to the general pediatrician (GP) once remission is achieved. Methods Adherence was assessed in patients referred to the GP for an annual basis follow-up, called back for re-evaluation. Immunoglobulin A (IgA) antitissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibodies and the Biagi score (BS) were determined at last follow-up at the referral center (V1), and at re-evaluation (V2). Patients were classified as adherent (BS 3-4, IgA anti-tTG Results We evaluated 200 patients. Overall, we found good adherence rates in 94.95% of patients at V1 and 83.5% at V2. IgA anti-tTG were negative in 100% at V1 and 96.97% at V2. BS is 3 to 4 in 94.5% at V1 and 84% at V2. Adherence at V2 was significantly worse than V1 (P Conclusions The BS, serology, and a clinical interview, integrated, are reliable tools for assessing pediatric adherence to gluten-free diet. We argue that referring patients to the GP after remission of CD is important, but the process must be improved and recommendations are required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002676

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sbravati, F., Pagano, S., Retetangos, C., Spisni, E., Bolasco, G., Labriola, F., Filardi, M. C., Grondona, A. G., & Alvisi, P.
Affiliations
  • Paediatric Gastroenterology Unit Ausl Bologna Italy
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Ospedale Maggiore Carlo Alberto Pizzardi (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Sbravati, Francesca
  • Pagano, Sara
  • Retetangos, Cristiana
  • Bolasco, Giulia
  • Labriola, Flavio
  • Filardi, Maria C.
  • Alvisi, Patrizia
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
78-82
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W3009282320
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
celiac disease, gluten-free diet adherence, pediatric celiac disease, remission, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, age as risk factor, foreign nationality, adherence assessment tools
MeSH terms
Pediatricians, Adolescent, Autoantibodies, Celiac Disease, Child, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Transglutaminases, Referral and Consultation, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review