A Narrow Window: Booming Gluten‐free Market and Fostering Healthy Dietary Habits in Children With Celiac Disease
Abstract
An expanding gluten-free marketplace has left children with celiac disease and their families with a host of new dietary options. The quality of these foods is inconsistent and processed items may be high in caloric content while lacking nutritional value. Assessing the dietary preferences of a cohort of children with celiac disease via cross-sectional survey, we find that these processed food items have become a staple of the gluten-free diet, and in many cases, these foods are consumed to the exclusion of healthy alternatives. Furthermore, children with celiac disease and their families become less interested in dietary education over time, indicating that the greatest opportunity for imparting a healthy diet may occur at the time of diagnosis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children with coeliac disease and their families become less interested in dietary education over time, thus, the greatest opportunity to teach patients and parents about the gluten-free diet is at the time of diagnosis.
“Children with CD and their families become less interested in dietary education over time, thus, the greatest opportunity to teach patients and parents about the GFD is at the time of diagnosis (123).”
Cites
The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Minor, B. L., Elliott, V., Fernandez, M., O'Neal, L., McLeod, L., Delacqua, G., Delacqua, F., Kirby, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 · Cited by 24,013 · see citing works
Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Singh, P., Arora, A., Strand, T. A., Leffler, D. A., Catassi, C., Green, P. H., Kelly, C. P., Ahuja, V., & Makharia, G. K. (2018) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037 · Cited by 1,743 · see citing works
Serum Vitamins and Minerals at Diagnosis and Follow‐up in Children With Celiac Disease
Deora, V., Aylward, N., Sokoro, A., & El‐Matary, W. (2017) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000001475 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Luque, V., Crespo‐Escobar, P., Hård af Segerstad, E. M., Koltai, T., Norsa, L., Roman, E., Vreugdenhil, A., Fueyo‐Díaz, R., & Ribes‐Koninckx, C. (2024) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1002/jpn3.12079 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Runde, J., Mears, M., Guandalini, S., & Jericho, H.
- Affiliations
- Comer Children's Hospital (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Runde, Joseph
- Guandalini, Stefano
- Jericho, Hilary
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-07-02
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 533-535
- ISSN
- 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-4801
- OpenAlex
- W3041626832
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- celiac disease, gluten-free diet, children, food preferences, nutrition education, dietary energy level
- MeSH terms
- Celiac Disease, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Nutritional Status, Diet, Gluten-Free
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
