Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Donor Human Milk for Preterm Infants: Current Evidence and Research Directions

ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition, Arslanoglu, Sertac, Corpeleijn, Willemijn, Moro, Guido, Braegger, Christian, Campoy, Cristina, Colomb, Virginie, Decsi, Tamas, Domellöf, Magnus, Fewtrell, Mary, Hojsak, Iva, Mihatsch, Walter, Mølgaard, Christian, Shamir, Raanan, Turck, Dominique, van Goudoever, Johannes·2013·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

The Committee on Nutrition of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition aims to document the existing evidence of the benefits and common concerns deriving from the use of donor human milk (DHM) in preterm infants. The comment also outlines gaps in knowledge and gives recommendations for practice and suggestions for future research directions. Protection against necrotizing enterocolitis is the major clinical benefit deriving from the use of DHM when compared with formula. Limited data also suggest unfortified DHM to be associated with improved feeding tolerance and with reduced cardiovascular risk factors during adolescence. Presence of a human milk bank (HMB) does not decrease breast‐feeding rates at discharge, but decreases the use of formula during the first weeks of life. This commentary emphasizes that fresh own mother's milk (OMM) is the first choice in preterm infant feeding and strong efforts should be made to promote lactation. When OMM is not available, DHM is the recommended alternative. When neither OMM nor DHM is available, preterm formula should be used. DHM should be provided from an established HMB, which follows specific safety guidelines. Storage and processing of human milk reduces some biological components, which may diminish its health benefits. From a nutritional point of view, DHM, like HM, does not meet the requirements of preterm infants, necessitating a specific fortification regimen to optimize growth. Future research should focus on the improvement of milk processing in HMB, particularly of heat treatment; on the optimization of HM fortification; and on further evaluation of the potential clinical benefits of processed and fortified DHM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0b013e3182a3af0a

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition, Arslanoglu, S., Corpeleijn, W., Moro, G., Braegger, C., Campoy, C., Colomb, V., Decsi, T., Domellöf, M., Fewtrell, M., Hojsak, I., Mihatsch, W., Mølgaard, C., Shamir, R., Turck, D., & van Goudoever, J.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
535-542
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2036891169
Cited by
408
References
62
FWCI
23.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Donor Human Milk for Preterm Infants: Current Evidence and Research Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mpg.0b013e3182a3af0a
The paper
ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition, Arslanoglu, S., Corpeleijn, W., Moro, G., Braegger, C., Campoy, C., Colomb, V., Decsi, T., Domellöf, M., Fewtrell, M., Hojsak, I., Mihatsch, W., Mølgaard, C., Shamir, R., Turck, D., & van Goudoever, J. (2013). Donor Human Milk for Preterm Infants: Current Evidence and Research Directions. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0b013e3182a3af0a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.