Cited by 124Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCancer survivorship and care

Measuring Death-related Anxiety in Advanced Cancer: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Death and Dying Distress Scale

Lo, Christopher, Hales, Sarah, Zimmermann, Camilla, Gagliese, Lucia, Rydall, Anne, Rodin, Gary·2011·Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology

Abstract

The alleviation of distress associated with death and dying is a central goal of palliative care, despite the lack of routine measurement of this outcome. In this study, we introduce the Death and Dying Distress Scale (DADDS), a new, brief measure we have developed to assess death-related anxiety in advanced cancer and other palliative populations. We describe its preliminary psychometrics based on a sample of 33 patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. The DADDS broadly captures distress about the loss of time and opportunity, the process of death and dying, and its impact on others. The initial version of the scale has a one-factor structure and good internal reliability. Dying and death-related distress was positively associated with depression and negatively associated with spiritual, emotional, physical, and functional well-being, providing early evidence of construct validity. This distress was relatively common, with 45% of the sample scoring in the upper reaches of the scale, suggesting that the DADDS may be a relevant outcome for palliative intervention. We conclude by presenting a revised 15-item version of the scale for further study in advanced cancer and other palliative populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mph.0b013e318230e1fd

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reducing psychological distress and death anxiety is a fundamental element of end-of-life care and treatment.

    “Based on this evidence, reducing psychological distress and death anxiety is a fundamental element of end-of-life care and treatment (Lo, Hales, Jung, Chiu, Panday, Rydall, et al., 2014;Lo, Hales, Zimmermann, Gagliese, Rydall and Rodin, 2011;Sherman et al., 2010).”

    From Death anxiety and its role in psychopathology: Reviewing the status of a transdiagnostic construct (2014) · cites this paper as Lo, Hales, Zimmermann, Gagliese, Rydall and Rodin, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lo, C., Hales, S., Zimmermann, C., Gagliese, L., Rydall, A., & Rodin, G.
Affiliations
University Health Network (CA)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
Published
2011-10
Volume
33
Issue
Supplement 2
Pages
S140-S145
ISSN
1077-4114 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2313442361
Cited by
124
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
advanced cancer, palliative care, psychometric validation, depression, well-being, scale development, metastatic cancer
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Aged, Anxiety, Attitude to Death, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Pilot Projects, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review