The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patient Navigation in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of the patient navigator in cancer care and specifically in breast cancer care has grown to incorporate many titles and functions. OBJECTIVE: To better evaluate the outcomes of patient navigation in breast cancer care, a comprehensive review of empiric literature detailing the efficacy of breast cancer navigation on breast cancer outcomes (screening, diagnosis, treatment, and participation in clinical research) was performed. METHODS: Published articles were reviewed if published in the scientific literature between January 1990 and April 2009. Searches were conducted using PubMed and Ovid databases. Search terms included MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms, "patient navigator," "navigation," "breast cancer," and "adherence." RESULTS: Data-based literature indicates that the role of patient navigation is diverse with multiple roles and targeted populations. Navigation across many aspects of the breast cancer disease trajectory improves adherence to breast cancer care. The empiric review found that navigation interventions have been more commonly applied in breast cancer screening and early diagnosis than for adherence to treatment. CONCLUSION: There is evidence supporting the role of patient navigation in breast cancer to improve many aspects of breast cancer care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Data describing the role of patient navigation in breast cancer will assist in better defining future direction for the breast navigation role. Ongoing research will better inform issues related to role definition, integration into clinical breast cancer care, impact on quality of life, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)
Cardoso, F., Costa, A., Norton, L., Senkus, E., Aapro, M., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Bergh, J., Biganzoli, L., Blackwell, K. L., et al. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu385 · Cited by 540
“A ‘patient navigator’ can help the patient going through all phases of the cancer journey [16–20].”
BackgroundThe role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparities
Natale‐Pereira, A., Enard, K. R., Nevarez, L., & Jones, L. A. (2011) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.26264 · Cited by 474
ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)
Cardoso, F., Costa, A., Norton, L., Senkus, E., Aapro, M., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Bergh, J., Biganzoli, L., Blackwell, K. L., et al. (2014) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.009 · Cited by 338
Navigation delivery models and roles of navigators in primary care: a scoping literature review
Carter, N., Valaitis, R. K., Lam, A., Feather, J., Nicholl, J., & Cleghorn, L. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-2889-0 · Cited by 282
Chong, E., Crowe, L., Mentor, K., Pandanaboyana, S., & Sharp, L. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07468-7 · Cited by 86
“Patient navigation programs could be one route to better meet caregiver (and patient) needs and improve access to the services [46].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson-White, S., Conroy, B., Slavish, K. H., & Rosenzweig, M.
- Venue
- Cancer Nursing
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-140
- ISSN
- 0162-220X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995768955
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient Navigation in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ncc.0b013e3181c40401
- The paper
- Robinson-White, S., Conroy, B., Slavish, K. H., & Rosenzweig, M. (2010). Patient Navigation in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancer Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1097/ncc.0b013e3181c40401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.