The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mindfulness, Multitasking, and You
Abstract
The ability to multitask has been typically worn like a badge of honor for all case managers. Mindfulness, on the contrary, is the new kid on the block and is proving to increase resilience and decrease stress. Research shows that multitasking lowers IQ, shrinks the gray matter, and lowers productivity by 40%. Conversely, mindfulness increases gray matter and improves regions involved with learning and memory processes, modulation of emotional control, and the process of awareness. The research leaves more questions than answers but may be a key to engaged, focused, and less-stressed staff.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“when the nurses are interrupted in their task, their attention is shifted from the initial process to the new process with a decay of the memory of the initial process; this leads to an increase in response time when returning to the initial task or even the nurse starting the initial task over and hence a likelihood of overwhelmed cognitive capacities [14] and decreased productivity and accuracy”
From Workflow interruption and nurses’ mental workload in electronic health record tasks: An observational study (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density
Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., & Lazar, S. W. (2011) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006 · Cited by 1,914
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shan, Y., Shang, J., Yan, Y., & Ye, X. (2023) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01209-9 · Cited by 79
Vacheron, C.-H., Peyrouset, O., Incagnoli, P., Charra, V., Parat, S., David, J.-S., Theissen, A., Piriou, V., & Friggeri, A. (2023) · Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2021.05.013 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Powell, S. K.
- Corresponding author
- Powell, Suzanne K.
- Venue
- Professional Case Management
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-62
- ISSN
- 1932-8087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2461872752
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Professional Case Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- mindfulness, multitasking, case managers, resilience, stress reduction, gray matter, cognitive function, emotional control, employee engagement, productivity
- MeSH terms
- Efficiency, Humans, Case Management, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
