Dissociation From a Cross-Cultural Perspective: Implications of Studies in Brazil
Abstract
A major issue in the study of dissociation concerns the cross-cultural validity of definitions and measurements used to identify and classify dissociative disorders. There is also extensive debate on the etiological factors underlying dissociative experiences. Cross-cultural research is essential to elucidate these issues, particularly regarding evidence obtained from countries in which the study of dissociation is still in its infancy. The aim of this article was to discuss Brazilian research on the topic of dissociation, highlighting its contributions for the understanding of dissociative experiences in nonclinical populations and for the validity and relevance of dissociative disorders in the contexts of psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy. We also consider the ways in which dissociative experiences are assimilated by Brazilian culture and religious expressions, and the implications of Brazilian studies for the sociocultural investigation of dissociation. We conclude by addressing the limitations of these studies and potential areas for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mental health professionals do not generally receive adequate training to address the R/S aspects of their patients, including experiences of possession, which is important for avoiding erroneous diagnoses and iatrogenic symptoms.
“Still, mental health professionals do not generally receive adequate training to address the R/S aspects of their patients,38 including experiences of possession, which would be of paramount importance for avoiding erroneous diagnoses and iatrogenic symptoms.37,39”
From How psychiatrists think about religious and spiritual beliefs in clinical practice: findings from a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Maraldi, E. D. O., Krippner, S., Barros, M. C. M., & Cunha, A.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Maraldi, Everton de Oliveira
- Venue
- Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 205
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 558-567
- ISSN
- 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-736X
- OpenAlex
- W2622123672
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- dissociation, dissociative disorders, cross-cultural validity, non-clinical population, psychotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Trauma, Brazil, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Depersonalization, Dissociative Disorders, Humans, Religion and Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review