Cited by 209Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A Review of Dissociative Disorders Treatment Studies

Brand, Bethany L., Classen, Catherine C., McNary, Scot W., Zaveri, Parin·2009·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This review examines empirical reports of treatment for Dissociative Disorders (DD), including 16 DD treatment outcome studies and 4 case studies that used standardized measures. Collectively, these reports suggest that treatment for DD is associated with decreased symptoms of dissociation, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, distress, and suicidality. Effect sizes, based on pre/post measures, are in the medium to large range across studies. Patients with dissociative disorder who integrated their dissociated self states were found to have reduced symptomatology compared with those who did not integrate. The magnitude of pre/post effect sizes for these DD studies are comparable to pre/post effect sizes in treatment studies of complex PTSD. There are significant methodological limitations in the current DD treatment outcome literature that reduce internal and external validity including regression towards the mean, limited sample sizes, and nonrandomized research designs. Implications for future research and treatment planning for patients suffering from DD are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181b3afaa

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 50 · Cited by 209

Authors
Brand, B. L., Classen, C. C., McNary, S. W., & Zaveri, P.
Affiliations
  • Towson University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Brand, Bethany L.
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2009-09
Volume
197
Issue
9
Pages
646-654
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017249304
Cited by
209
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
dissociative disorders, dissociation, treatment outcomes, complex PTSD, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, suicidality, dissociative identity disorder, methodological limitations, effect size
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Clinical Trials as Topic, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Care Planning, Psychotherapy, Psychotropic Drugs, Research Design, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Empirical Research, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review