Distinctive clinical characteristics and suicidal tendencies of patients with anxious depression
Open accessAbstract
This study evaluated clinical characteristics and suicidality of patients with anxious depression in a large cohort of samples. Data were collected from 1003 patients who were depressed. A total of 461 patients were diagnosed with anxious depression and 542 were diagnosed with nonanxious depression. After adjusting for the severity of depression, those in the anxious depression group had significantly younger onset age, had been suffering from depression for a longer period, were more likely to experience a recurrence, and obtained lower scores on a scale assessing quality of life. The anxious depression group was characterized by a significantly higher proportion of individuals reporting significant suicidal ideation and previous suicide attempts, and those in this group tended to obtain higher scores on the Scale for Suicide Ideation. The present findings that were drawn from detailed evaluation of suicidality strongly support previous results assessed only with the help of clinical reports. More attention should be paid to assess suicide risk in these patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Depressed patients with anxiety symptoms measured with the HAM-D ASF or HAM-A generally have greater depression chronicity and severity, higher suicide ideation and risks, and lower quality of life than MDD patients without anxiety.
“Either measured with the HAM-D ASF score or HAM-A, depressed patients with anxiety symptoms generally have greater depression chronicity and severity [1,5,6], higher suicide ideation and risks [1,8,9], and lower QOL than MDD patients without anxiety.”
From Patients with anxious depression: overview of prevalence, pathophysiology and impact on course and treatment outcome (2018) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Seo, H.-J., Jung, Y.-E., Kim, T.-S., Kim, J.-B., Lee, M.-S., Kim, J.-M., Lim, H.-W., & Jun, T.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Catholic University of Korea (KR)
- Chonnam National University (KR)
- Korea University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Seo, Ho-Jun
- Jung, Young-Eun
- Kim, Tae-Suk
- Jun, Tae-Youn
- Venue
- Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-48
- ISSN
- 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074943169
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KUMeL Repository (Keimyung University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- anxious depression, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, suicide risk, clinical features, depression duration, depression recurrence, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review