The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Telehealth Education: Impact on Provider Experience and Adoption
Open accessAbstract
Background: COVID-19 propelled telehealth to the forefront of health care, forcing many advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to incorporate telehealth into their practice without sufficient education. Lack of training has been cited as a barrier to telehealth adoption. Purpose: This study evaluated provider adoption of telehealth based on the type of telehealth education received. Methods: A quantitative survey of telehealth providers (n = 224) was distributed through the listservs of 4 national organizations to determine whether there was a significant difference in provider levels of perceived usefulness, self-efficacy, perceived knowledge, satisfaction, and use of telehealth based on the type of telehealth education received. Results: Telehealth adoption was significantly associated with the type of telehealth education received (vendor, online, written instructions only, and on the spot). Conclusion: With telehealth utilization expected to endure postpandemic, faculty should incorporate the most effective telehealth education methods into APRN curricula, ensuring successful adoption by the future workforce.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, both studies [39,40] indicate that structured educational approaches, such as online courses and simulation-based training, are significantly more effective than improvised or passive formats, like written instructions.”
From Patient safety risk associated with synchronous telehealth: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [40]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, the study by Garber and Gustin (2022) [40] reinforces that most healthcare providers do not receive formal telehealth training during their academic education and are expected to learn on the job.”
From Patient safety risk associated with synchronous telehealth: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [40]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In addition to training, accurate patient identification is a critical component of patient safety, recognized as the first goal proposed by the WHO [40].”
From Patient safety risk associated with synchronous telehealth: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [40]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review
Scott Kruse, C., Karem, P., Shifflett, K., Vegi, L., Ravi, K., & Brooks, M. (2018) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x16674087 · Cited by 1,735
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Flannery, 2018, Building a regulatory and payment framework flexible enough to withstand technological progress, Health Aff (Millwood), 37, 2052, 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05151 · DOI
- Ranganathan, 2020, Key factors affecting the adoption of telemedicine by ambulatory clinics: insights from a statewide survey, Telemed J E Health, 26, 218, 10.1089/tmj.2018.0114 · DOI
- Zanaboni, 2012, Adoption of telemedicine: from pilot stage to routine delivery, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 12, 1, 10.1186/1472-6947-12-1 · DOI
- Jumreornvong, 2020, Telemedicine and medical education in the age of COVID-19, Acad Med, 95, 1838, 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003711 · DOI
- Koonin, 2020, Trends in the use of telehealth during the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic— United States, January-March 2020, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 69, 1595, 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943a3 · DOI
- Verma, 2020, Early impact of CMS expansion of Medicare telehealth during COVID-19, Health Aff
- Wade, 2014, Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services, Qual Health Res, 24, 682, 10.1177/1049732314528809 · DOI · Paper page
- Arends, 2019, Enhancing the nurse practitioner curriculum to improve telehealth competency, J Am Assoc Nurse Pract, 33, 391, 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000303 · DOI
- Moore, 2016, Only 15% of FPs report using telehealth; training and lack of reimbursement are top barriers, Am Fam Physician, 93, 101
- Mozer, 2015, Identifying perceived barriers to videoconferencing by rehabilitation medicine providers, J Telemed Telecare, 21, 479, 10.1177/1357633X15607136 · DOI
- LeRouge, 2014, Patient perspectives of telemedicine quality, Patient Prefer Adherence, 9, 25, 10.2147/PPA.S67506 · DOI
- Rutledge, 2017, Telehealth and eHealth in nurse practitioner training: current perspectives, Adv Med Educ Pract, 8, 399, 10.2147/AMEP.S116071 · DOI
- Chike-Harris, 2021, Integration of telehealth education into the health care provider curriculum: areview, Telemed J E Health, 27, 137, 10.1089/tmj.2019.0261 · DOI
- Rutledge, 2020, Telehealth education: an interprofessional online immersion experience in response to COVID-19, J Nurs Educ, 59, 570, 10.3928/01484834-20200921-06 · DOI
- Jonas, 2019, An interdisciplinary, multi-institution telehealth course for third-year medical students, Acad Med, 94, 833, 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002701 · DOI
- Pourmand, 2021, Lack of telemedicine training in academic medicine: are we preparing the next generation, Telemed J E Health, 27, 62, 10.1089/tmj.2019.0287 · DOI
- Papanagno, 2015, Training the next generation of care providers: focus on telehealth, Healthcare Transformation, 1, 52, 10.1089/heat.2015.29001-psh · DOI
- Edirippulige, 2017, Education and training to support the use of clinical telehealth: a review of the literature, J Telemed Telecare, 23, 273, 10.1177/1357633X16632968 · DOI
- Ainslie, 2018, Telemedicine simulation in online family nurse practitioner education: clinical competency and technology integration, J Am Assoc Nurse Pract, 30, 430, 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000071 · DOI
- Posey, 2020, Nurse practitioner student perceptions of face-to-face and telehealth standardized patient simulations, J Nurs Regul, 10
- Gustin, 2020, Telehealth etiquette training: a guideline for preparing interprofessional teams for successful encounters, Nurse Educ, 45, 88, 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000680 · DOI
- Lewis, 2019, Comparison of four TAM item formats: effect of response option labels and order, J Usability Stud, 14, 224
- Rutledge, 2021, Telehealth competencies for nursing education and practice: the four P's of telehealth, Nurse Educ, 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000988 · DOI
- Scholle, As value-based care and telehealth rise, patient experience measurement desperately needs an update for the digital age, Health Aff
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Patient safety risk associated with synchronous telehealth: A scoping review
Oliveira, J. S. R. D., Fernandez, R. S., Molina, M. R., Pinto, A. C. P. N., Rocha-Filho, C. R., Ferreira, T. M., & Peres, S. V. (2025) · PLoS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0336992 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Garber, K., & Gustin, T.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garber, Kelli
- Venue
- Nurse Educator
- Published
- 2021-10-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-80
- ISSN
- 0363-3624 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-9855
- PMC
- PMC8866200
- OpenAlex
- W3205862856
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nurse Educator (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (U01TR002626)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
- Keywords
- telemedicine, advanced practice nurses, telehealth education, telehealth adoption, perceived usefulness, self-efficacy, perceived knowledge, provider satisfaction, COVID-19 pandemic, online training, vendor training
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Nursing Education Research, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
