The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using Generative AI to Produce Images for Nursing Education
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is a type of AI that allows for the creation of brand-new content. It uses machine learning from massive data sets to create images, video, and text. With AI on the rise in society and in health care, nurse educators need to find ethical ways to integrate these technologies into educational practices. Most discussion on the use of AI in education has centered on chat-based tools such as ChatGPT or Bing Chat, mostly due to concerns with cheating. Less attention, however, has been paid to AI image generation using tools such as Midjourney, DALL∙E 2, and Stable Diffusion. These AI-based image generators provide a way for users to easily create never-before-seen images from a variety of artistic genres using simple text prompts. Although research is in its infancy early benefits of using images in healthcare education include increasing students' self-reflection, emotional intelligence, critical analysis, and dialogue on complex topics, which are all essential skills in building clinical judgment. Pragmatically, nursing educators can use these unique images to support visual learning and reflection in the classroom, laboratory, simulation, and clinical settings. Generative AI can also allow students and educators to explore mental representations and the public image of nursing in the culture. Generative AI technologies, and particularly AI-based image generation, can be a powerful teaching method to connect art, emotional processing, and reflection, which, when combined, can provide meaningful learning experiences for students.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Equity gaps emerged through digital access disparities and language barriers, with a concerning concentration of studies in high-income settings creating knowledge deficits in low-resource contexts.
“Equity gaps emerged through digital access disparities and language barriers, with a concerning concentration of studies in high-income settings creating knowledge deficits in low-resource contexts”
From Patterns, advances, and gaps in using ChatGPT and similar technologies in nursing education: A PAGER scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as Reed, 2023
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Temsah, M.-H., Alhuzaimi, A. N., Almansour, M., Aljamaan, F., Alhasan, K., Batarfi, M. A., Altamimi, I., Alharbi, A., Alsuhaibani, A. A., Alwakeel, L., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-024-02072-0 · Cited by 66
AI Image-Generation as a Teaching Strategy in Nursing Education
Reed, J., Alterio, B., Coblenz, H., O'Lear, T., & Metz, T. (2023) · Journal of Interactive Learning Research · doi:10.70725/729255gdiorw · Cited by 38
Self-citationAmankwaa, I., Ekpor, E., Cudjoe, D., Kobiah, E., Fuseini, A.-K. J., Diebieri, M., Gyamfi, S., & Brownie, S. (2025) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106822 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Kent State University at Stark (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reed, Janet M.
- ORCID
- Reed, Janet M.
- Venue
- Nurse Educator
- Published
- 2023-05-10
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 246-246
- ISSN
- 0363-3624 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-9855
- OpenAlex
- W4376109635
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nurse Educator (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- generative AI, AI image generation, nursing education, Midjourney, DALL-E 2, Stable Diffusion, visual learning, reflection, emotional intelligence, clinical judgment, AI ethics in education, mental representation, nursing image, simulation-based training
- MeSH terms
- Education, Nursing, Humans, Nursing Education Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review