Cited by 21Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationInnovations in Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Using Generative AI to Produce Images for Nursing Education

Reed, Janet M.·2023·Nurse Educator

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is a type of AI that allows for the creation of brand-new content. It uses machine learning from massive data sets to create images, video, and text. With AI on the rise in society and in health care, nurse educators need to find ethical ways to integrate these technologies into educational practices. Most discussion on the use of AI in education has centered on chat-based tools such as ChatGPT or Bing Chat, mostly due to concerns with cheating. Less attention, however, has been paid to AI image generation using tools such as Midjourney, DALL∙E 2, and Stable Diffusion. These AI-based image generators provide a way for users to easily create never-before-seen images from a variety of artistic genres using simple text prompts. Although research is in its infancy early benefits of using images in healthcare education include increasing students' self-reflection, emotional intelligence, critical analysis, and dialogue on complex topics, which are all essential skills in building clinical judgment. Pragmatically, nursing educators can use these unique images to support visual learning and reflection in the classroom, laboratory, simulation, and clinical settings. Generative AI can also allow students and educators to explore mental representations and the public image of nursing in the culture. Generative AI technologies, and particularly AI-based image generation, can be a powerful teaching method to connect art, emotional processing, and reflection, which, when combined, can provide meaningful learning experiences for students.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nne.0000000000001453

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Equity gaps emerged through digital access disparities and language barriers, with a concerning concentration of studies in high-income settings creating knowledge deficits in low-resource contexts.

    “Equity gaps emerged through digital access disparities and language barriers, with a concerning concentration of studies in high-income settings creating knowledge deficits in low-resource contexts”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Reed, J. M.
Affiliations
Kent State University at Stark (US)
Corresponding author
Reed, Janet M.
Venue
Nurse Educator
Published
2023-05-10
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
246-246
ISSN
  • 0363-3624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9855
OpenAlex
W4376109635
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Educator (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
generative AI, AI image generation, nursing education, Midjourney, DALL-E 2, Stable Diffusion, visual learning, reflection, emotional intelligence, clinical judgment, AI ethics in education, mental representation, nursing image, simulation-based training
MeSH terms
Education, Nursing, Humans, Nursing Education Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review