Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: An Overview of National and International Guidelines
Abstract
Importance: Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia are leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Τhe lack of effective screening and management policies appears to be one of the main reasons. Objective: The aim of this study was to review and compare recommendations from published guidelines on these common pregnancy complications. Evidence Acquisition: A descriptive review of guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, the International Society of Hypertension, the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy, the European Society of Cardiology, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, the World Health Organization, and the US Preventive Services Task Force on gestational hypertension and preeclampsia was carried out. Results: There is an overall agreement that, in case of suspected preeclampsia or new-onset hypertension, blood and urine tests should be carried out, including dipstick test for proteinuria, whereas placental growth factor–based testing is only recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and the European Society of Cardiology. In addition, there is a consensus on the recommendations for the medical treatment of severe and nonsevere hypertension, the management of preeclampsia, the appropriate timing of delivery, the optimal method of anesthesia and the mode of delivery, the administration of antenatal corticosteroids and the use of magnesium sulfate for the treatment of eclamptic seizures, the prevention of eclampsia in cases of severe preeclampsia, and the neuroprotection of preterm neonates. The reviewed guidelines also state that, based on maternal risk factors, pregnant women identified to be at high risk for preeclampsia should receive low-dose aspirin starting ideally in the first trimester until labor or 36 to 37 weeks of gestation, although the recommended dose varies between 75 and 162 mg/d. Moreover, most guidelines recommend calcium supplementation for the prevention of preeclampsia and discourage the use of other agents. However, controversy exists regarding the definition and the optimal screening method for preeclampsia, the need for treating mild hypertension, the blood pressure treatment targets, and the postnatal blood pressure monitoring. Conclusions: The development and implementation of consistent international protocols will allow clinicians to adopt effective universal screening, as well as preventive and management strategies with the intention of improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. Target Audience: Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians Learning Objectives: After participating in this activity, the physician should be better able to define gestational hypertension and preeclampsia; identify the risk factors and explain available screening methods for preeclampsia; and describe the recommended antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care of women with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The AWMF and ISUOG mention that in high-risk women, with a risk of more than 1 in 100 of developing preeclampsia, the administration of 150 mg of aspirin daily should be recommended until 36 gestational weeks.
“Of note, the AWMF and ISUOG mention that in high-risk women, with a risk of more than 1 in 100 of developing preeclampsia, the administration of 150 mg of aspirin daily should be recommended until 36 gestational weeks [77].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
Cites
WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review
Khan, K. S., Wojdyla, D., Say, L., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & Van Look, P. F. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68397-9 · Cited by 3,978 · see citing works
Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia
(2020) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003891 · Cited by 2,949 · see citing works
Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia
Rolnik, D. L., Wright, D., Poon, L. C., O’Gorman, N., Syngelaki, A., de Paco Matallana, C., Akolekar, R., Cicero, S., Janga, D., Singh, M., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1704559 · Cited by 2,287 · see citing works
Less-Tight versus Tight Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy
Magee, L. A., von Dadelszen, P., Rey, E., Ross, S., Asztalos, E., Murphy, K. E., Menzies, J., Sanchez, J., Singer, J., Gafni, A., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1404595 · Cited by 672 · see citing works
O’Gorman, N., Wright, D., Syngelaki, A., Akolekar, R., Wright, A., Poon, L. C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2016) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.034 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis
Roberge, S., Bujold, E., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.561 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Meher, S., & Duley, L. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005939 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
Self-citation
- Authors
- Tsakiridis, I., Giouleka, S., Arvanitaki, A., Giannakoulas, G., Papazisis, G., Mamopoulos, A., Athanasiadis, A., & Dagklis, T.
- Affiliations
- Clinical Fellow in Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- Associate Professor, First Department of Cardiology
- Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacology
- Professor
- Corresponding author
- Tsakiridis, Ioannis
- Mamopoulos, Apostolos
- Athanasiadis, Apostolos
- ORCID
- Venue
- Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 613-633
- ISSN
- 0029-7828 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-9866
- OpenAlex
- W3210381192
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Keywords
- gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, preeclampsia screening, proteinuria, placental growth factor, antihypertensive therapy, timing of delivery, magnesium sulfate, eclampsia prevention, antenatal corticosteroids, low-dose aspirin, calcium supplementation, preeclampsia prevention, blood pressure targets
- MeSH terms
- Placenta Growth Factor, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Infant, Newborn, Obstetrics, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review