Online psychological self-management intervention for testicular cancer survivors (e-TC 2.0): promising acceptability and preliminary efficacy, but limited feasibility
Open accessAbstract
Background: Testicular cancer (TC) survivors experience greater psychological morbidity than the general population. Two-thirds of TC survivors report unmet supportive care needs regarding issues such as fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), but many are reluctant/unable to seek face-to-face help. This study prospectively assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an interactive web-based self-management intervention (e-TC 2.0) in reducing borderline/clinical levels of anxiety, depression, and/or FCR among TC survivors. Methods: TC survivors who had completed treatment were recruited to this single-arm phase I trial through clinicians and online advertisements. Consenting participants completed baseline questionnaires, had 12 weeks’ access to e-TC 2.0, then completed post-intervention questionnaires. Feasibility was determined by the proportion of e-TC 2.0 completed (website usage data). Acceptability was assessed with purpose-designed satisfaction measures. Preliminary efficacy was indicated by changes in anxiety/depression (HADS), distress (thermometer), and FCR (Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form). Results: Thirty-nine participants started the intervention; 48% completed the first module, but only 20% completed all modules. Mean participant age was 37.1 years; mean time since diagnosis was 3.6 years. Mean acceptability scores were > 8/10. Mean unmet needs, distress, FCR, anxiety, and depression levels decreased after the intervention, as di…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heiniger et al. piloted the e-TC intervention with testicular cancer survivors without significant psychological morbidity and later piloted an updated intervention (e-TC 2.0) with participants with borderline/clinical levels of anxiety, depression, and/or FCR based on their pilot findings that the intervention is more beneficial for individuals who exhibit heightened FCR.
“Heiniger et al. [47] piloted the e-TC intervention with testicular cancer survivors without significant psychological morbidity and later piloted an updated intervention (e-TC 2.0) [48] with participants with borderline/clinical levels of anxiety, depression, and/or FCR based on their pilot findings that the intervention is more beneficial for individuals who exhibit heightened FCR.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 10 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Smith, A. ‘., Rincones, O., Heiniger, L., Grimison, P., Tran, B., Stockler, M. R., Toner, G., Cohen, B., Olver, I., Klein, B., McJannett, M., & Butow, P.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (AU)
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Auckland District Health Board (NZ)
- Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (AU)
- Federation University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Allan ‘Ben’
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research & Practice
- Published
- 2020-09-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e33
- ISSN
- 2637-5974 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3096596446
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- testicular cancer survivors, online intervention, fear of cancer recurrence, anxiety, depression, psychological distress, unmet supportive care needs, intervention feasibility, acceptability, online mental health services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review