The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The High-grade (WHO G3) Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Category Is Morphologically and Biologically Heterogenous and Includes Both Well Differentiated and Poorly Differentiated Neoplasms
Open accessAbstract
The 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification recommends that pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) be graded on the basis of the mitotic rate and Ki67 index, with grade 2 (G2) PanNETs defined as having a mitotic rate of 2 to 20 mitotic figures/10 high-power fields or a Ki67 index of 3% to 20%. Grade 3 (G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is defined as having >20 mitotic figures/10 high-power fields or a Ki67 index of >20%. However, some PanNETs show discordance between the mitotic rate and Ki67 index, usually having a Ki67 index in the G3 range but a mitotic rate suggesting G2, prompting us to examine the clinical significance of the Ki67 index in a large series of clinically well-characterized mitotic G2 PanNETs. Mitotic G2 well differentiated PanNETs, surgically resected at our institutions were reviewed. Of those, 19 cases had a Ki67>20% and were selected as the study group of grade-discordant (mitotic count G2/Ki67 index G3) PanNETs. For comparison, 53 grade-concordant (both mitotic count and Ki67 index G2) PanNETs matched for presenting stage with the discordant group as well as 43 morphologically poorly differentiated (either small cell or large cell type) pancreatic NECs were also included. The percentage of Ki67-positive neoplastic cells was quantified by manual counting of at least 500 cells on printed photographic images of "hot spots." The mean Ki67 index for grade-concordant and grade-discordant PanNETs and poorly differentiated NECs were 8.1% (range, 3% to 20%), 40% (range, 24% to 80%), and 70% (range, 40% to 98%), respectively. Overall, patients with grade-discordant PanNETs had significantly longer survival time compared with the patients with poorly differentiated NEC (median survival of 54.1 vs. 11 mo and 5 y survival of 29.1% vs. 16.1%; P=0.002). In addition, the survival time of the patients with grade-discordant PanNETs was shorter than that of the patients with grade-concordant PanNETs (median survival of 67.8 mo and 5 y survival of 62.4%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.2). Our data support the notion that the mitotic rate and Ki67 index-based grades of PanNETs can be discordant, and when the Ki67 index indicates G3, the clinical outcome is slightly worse. More importantly, we demonstrate that well differentiated PanNETs that are G3 by Ki67 are significantly less aggressive than bona fide poorly differentiated NECs, suggesting that the current WHO G3 category is heterogenous, contains 2 distinct neoplasms, and can be further separated into well differentiated PanNET with an elevated proliferation rate and poorly differentiated NEC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system
Rindi, G., Klöppel, G., Alhman, H., Caplin, M., Couvelard, A., de Herder, W. W., Erikssson, B., Falchetti, A., Falconi, M., Komminoth, P., et al. (2006) · Virchows Archiv · doi:10.1007/s00428-006-0250-1 · Cited by 1,547
Sorbye, H., Welin, S., Langer, S. W., Vestermark, L. W., Holt, N., Osterlund, P., Dueland, S., Hofsli, E., Guren, M. G., Ohrling, K., et al. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds276 · Cited by 1,027
Yachida, S., Vakiani, E., White, C. M., Zhong, Y., Saunders, T., Morgan, R., de Wilde, R. F., Maitra, A., Hicks, J., DeMarzo, A. M., et al. (2012) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0b013e3182417d36 · Cited by 534
Self-citationBasturk, O., Tang, L., Hruban, R. H., Adsay, V., Yang, Z., Krasinskas, A. M., Vakiani, E., La Rosa, S., Jang, K.-T., Frankel, W. L., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000000169 · Cited by 258
Self-citationMcCall, C. M., Shi, C., Cornish, T. C., Klimstra, D. S., Tang, L. H., Basturk, O., Mun, L. J., Ellison, T. A., Wolfgang, C. L., Choti, M. A., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000000089 · Cited by 175
Self-citationKi-67 predicts disease recurrence and poor prognosis in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
Hamilton, N. A., Liu, T., Cavatiao, A., Mawad, K., Chen, L., Strasberg, S. S., Linehan, D. C., Cao, D., & Hawkins, W. G. (2012) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2012.02.011 · Cited by 86
Cited by
Rindi, G., Klimstra, D. S., Abedi-Ardekani, B., Asa, S. L., Bosman, F. T., Brambilla, E., Busam, K. J., de Krijger, R. R., Dietel, M., El-Naggar, A. K., et al. (2018) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/s41379-018-0110-y · Cited by 1,163
Self-citationHuang, B., Lin, X., Shen, J., Chen, X., Chen, J., Li, Z.-P., Wang, M., Yuan, C., Diao, X.-F., Luo, Y., et al. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2021.3070708 · Cited by 35
von Arx, C., Capozzi, M., López-Jiménez, E., Ottaiano, A., Tatangelo, F., Di Mauro, A., Nasti, G., Tornesello, M. L., & Tafuto, S. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8091277 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Basturk, O., Yang, Z., Tang, L. H., Hruban, R. H., Adsay, V., McCall, C. M., Krasinskas, A. M., Jang, K.-T., Frankel, W. L., Balci, S., Sigel, C., & Klimstra, D. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 683-690
- ISSN
- 0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315116030
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 40.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The High-grade (WHO G3) Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Category Is Morphologically and Biologically Heterogenous and Includes Both Well Differentiated and Poorly Differentiated Neoplasms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/pas.0000000000000408
- The paper
- Basturk, O., Yang, Z., Tang, L. H., Hruban, R. H., Adsay, V., McCall, C. M., Krasinskas, A. M., Jang, K.-T., Frankel, W. L., Balci, S., Sigel, C., & Klimstra, D. S. (2015). The High-grade (WHO G3) Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Category Is Morphologically and Biologically Heterogenous and Includes Both Well Differentiated and Poorly Differentiated Neoplasms. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000000408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.