The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry Is an Efficient and Reliable Screen for the Detection of NTRK Fusions
Open accessAbstract
Activating neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions, typically detected using nucleic-acid based assays, are highly targetable and define certain tumors. Here, we explore the utility of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect NTRK fusions. NTRK rearrangements were detected prospectively using MSK-IMPACT, a DNA-based next-generation sequencing assay. Transcription of novel NTRK rearrangements into potentially functional fusion transcripts was assessed via Archer Dx fusion assay. Pan-Trk IHC testing with mAb EPR17341 was performed on all NTRK rearranged cases and 20 cases negative for NTRK fusions on Archer. Of 23 cases with NTRK rearrangements, 15 had known activating fusions. Archer detected fusion transcripts in 6 of 8 novel NTRK rearrangements of uncertain functional significance. Pan-Trk IHC was positive in 20 of 21 cases with NTRK fusion transcripts confirmed by Archer. The discordant negative case was a mismatch repair- deficient colorectal carcinoma with an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. All 20 additional Archer-negative cases had concordant pan-TRK IHC results. Pan-Trk IHC sensitivity and specificity for transcribed NTRK fusions was 95.2% and 100%, respectively. All positive IHC cases had cytoplasmic staining while the following fusion partner-specific patterns were discovered: all 5 LMNA-NTRK1 fusions displayed nuclear membrane accentuation, all 4 TPM3/4 fusions displayed cellular membrane accentuation, and half (3/6) of ETV6-NTRK3 fusions displayed nuclear staining. Pan-Trk IHC is a time-efficient and tissue-efficient screen for NTRK fusions, particularly in driver-negative advanced malignancies and potential cases of secretory carcinoma and congenital fibrosarcoma. Pan-Trk IHC can help determine whether translation occurs for novel NTRK rearrangements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targeting TRK family proteins in cancer
Khotskaya, Y. B., Holla, V. R., Farago, A. F., Mills Shaw, K. R., Meric-Bernstam, F., & Hong, D. S. (2017) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.006 · Cited by 292
Cited by
Molecular characterization of cancers with NTRK gene fusions
Gatalica, Z., Xiu, J., Swensen, J., & Vranic, S. (2019) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/s41379-018-0118-3 · Cited by 486
The current state of molecular testing in the treatment of patients with solid tumors, 2019
El‐Deiry, W. S., Goldberg, R. M., Lenz, H., Shields, A. F., Gibney, G. T., Tan, A. R., Brown, J., Eisenberg, B., Heath, E. I., Phuphanich, S., et al. (2019) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21560 · Cited by 264
Wang, H., Li, Z., Ou, Q., Wu, X., Nagasaka, M., Shao, Y., Ou, S. I., & Yang, Y. (2022) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.4561 · Cited by 64
Mahajan, A. T., Shivani, Datusalia, A. K., Coluccini, C., Coghi, P., & Chaudhary, S. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29153560 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Hechtman, J. F., Benayed, R., Hyman, D. M., Drilon, A., Zehir, A., Frosina, D., Arcila, M. E., Dogan, S., Klimstra, D. S., Ladanyi, M., & Jungbluth, A. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1547-1551
- ISSN
- 0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2738437255
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry Is an Efficient and Reliable Screen for the Detection of NTRK Fusions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/pas.0000000000000911
- The paper
- Hechtman, J. F., Benayed, R., Hyman, D. M., Drilon, A., Zehir, A., Frosina, D., Arcila, M. E., Dogan, S., Klimstra, D. S., Ladanyi, M., & Jungbluth, A. A. (2017). Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry Is an Efficient and Reliable Screen for the Detection of NTRK Fusions. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000000911
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.