Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epithelioid GBMs Show a High Percentage of BRAF V600E Mutation

Open access
Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, Bette Kay, Aisner, Dara L., Birks, Diane K., Foreman, Nicholas K.·2013·American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Abstract

BRAF V600E mutation has been identified in up to 2/3 of pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXAs), World Health Organization grade II, as well as in varying percentages of PXAs with anaplastic features (PXA-A), gangliogliomas, extracerebellar pilocytic astrocytomas, and, rarely, giant cell glioblastoma multiforme (GC-GBMs). GC-GBMs and epithelioid GBMs (E-GBMs) can be histologically challenging to distinguish from PXA-A. We undertook this study specifically to address whether these 2 tumor types also showed the mutation. We tested our originally reported cohort of 8 E-GBMs and 2 rhabdoid GBMs (R-GBM) as well as 5 new E-GBMs (1 pediatric, 4 adult) and 9 GC-GBMs (2 pediatric, 7 adult) (n=24) for BRAF V600E mutational status. Twenty-one of 24 had sufficient material for IDH-1 immunostaining, which is usually absent in PXAs, PXA-As, and primary GBMs but present in secondary GBMs. Patients ranged in age from 4 to 67 years. BRAF V600E mutation was identified in 7/13 of E-GBMs, including 3 of our original cases; patients with mutation were aged 10 to 50 years. None of the 9 GC-GBMs or 2 R-GBMs manifested this mutation, including pediatric patients. The sole secondary E-GBM was the single case manifesting positive IDH-1 immunoreactivity. A high percentage of E-GBMs manifest BRAF V600E mutation, paralleling PXAs. All R-GBMs and GC-GBMs were negative, although larger multi-institutional cohorts will have to be tested to extend this result. BRAF V600E mutational analyses should be performed on E-GBMs, particularly in all pediatric and young-aged adults, given the potential for BRAF inhibitor therapy in this subset of GBM patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pas.0b013e31827f9c5e

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K., Aisner, D. L., Birks, D. K., & Foreman, N. K.
Venue
American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Published
2013-05
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
685-698
ISSN
0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122004774
Cited by
260
References
2
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epithelioid GBMs Show a High Percentage of BRAF V600E Mutation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/pas.0b013e31827f9c5e
The paper
Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K., Aisner, D. L., Birks, D. K., & Foreman, N. K. (2013). Epithelioid GBMs Show a High Percentage of BRAF V600E Mutation. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0b013e31827f9c5e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.