Cited by 156Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Clinicopathological relevance of BRAF mutations in human cancer

Pakneshan, Sahar, Salajegheh, Ali, Anthony Smith, Robert, King-Yin Lam, Alfred·2013·Pathology

Abstract

BRAF represents one of the most frequently mutated protein kinase genes in human tumours. The mutation is commonly tested in pathology practice. BRAF mutation is seen in melanoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma (including papillary thyroid carcinoma arising from ovarian teratoma), ovarian serous tumours, colorectal carcinoma, gliomas, hepatobiliary carcinomas and hairy cell leukaemia. In these cancers, various genetic aberrations of the BRAF proto-oncogene, such as different point mutations and chromosomal rearrangements, have been reported. The most common mutation, BRAF V600E, can be detected by DNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry on formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tumour tissue. Detection of BRAF V600E mutation has the potential for clinical use as a diagnostic and prognostic marker. In addition, a great deal of research effort has been spent in strategies inhibiting its activity. Indeed, recent clinical trials involving BRAF selective inhibitors exhibited promising response rates in metastatic melanoma patients. Clinical trials are underway for other cancers. However, cutaneous side effects of treatment have been reported and therapeutic response to cancer is short-lived due to the emergence of several resistance mechanisms. In this review, we give an update on the clinical pathological relevance of BRAF mutation in cancer. It is hoped that the review will enhance the direction of future research and assist in more effective use of the knowledge of BRAF mutation in clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pat.0b013e328360b61d

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 145 · Cited by 156

Authors
Pakneshan, S., Salajegheh, A., Anthony Smith, R., & King-Yin Lam, A.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Venue
Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
346-356
ISSN
0031-3025 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966165090
Cited by
156
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
BRAF mutation, BRAF V600E mutation, melanoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, ovarian teratoma, colorectal cancer, glioma, hepatobiliary cancer, hairy cell leukemia, BRAF inhibitors, resistance mechanisms, prognostic factors, diagnostic biomarkers, chromosomal rearrangements
MeSH terms
Proto-Oncogene Mas, DNA Mutational Analysis, Humans, Melanoma, Membrane Proteins, Prognosis, Skin Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Rearrangement, Point Mutation, GTP Phosphohydrolases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review