The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simulation-based mock codes significantly correlate with improved pediatric patient cardiopulmonary arrest survival rates*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the viability and effectiveness of a simulation-based pediatric mock code program on patient outcomes, as well as residents' confidence in performing resuscitations. A resident's leadership ability is integral to accurate and efficient clinical response in the successful management of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). Direct experience is a contributing factor to a resident's code team leadership ability; however, opportunities to gain experience are limited by relative infrequency of pediatric arrests and code occurrences when residents are on service. DESIGN: Longitudinal, mixed-methods research design. SETTING: Children's hospital at an tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Pediatric. INTERVENTIONS: Clinicians responsible for pediatric resuscitations responded to mock codes randomly called at increasing rates over a 48-month period, just as they would an actual CPA event. Events were recorded and used for immediate debriefing facilitated by clinical faculty to provide residents feedback about their performance. MEASUREMENTS: Self-assessment data were collected from all team members. Hospital records for pediatric CPA survival rates were examined for the study duration. RESULTS: Survival rates increased to approximately 50% (p = .000), correlating with the increased number of mock codes (r = .87). These results are significantly above the average national pediatric CPA survival rates and held steady for 3 consecutive years, demonstrating the stability of the program's outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a simulation-based mock code program may significantly benefit pediatric patient CPA outcomes-applied clinical outcomes-not simply learner perceived value, increased confidence, or simulation-based outcomes. The use of mock codes as an integral part of residency programs could provide residents with the resuscitation training they require to become proficient in their practice. Future programs that incorporate transport scenarios, ambulatory care, and other outpatient settings could further benefit pediatric patients in prehospital contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patient Outcomes in Simulation-Based Medical Education: A Systematic Review
Zendejas, B., Brydges, R., Wang, A. T., & Cook, D. A. (2013) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2264-5 · Cited by 384
Greif (2020) · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.014 · Cited by 158
Contemporary Integrative Review in Simulation-Based Learning in Nursing
Rajaguru, V., & Park, J. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18020726 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Andreatta, P., Saxton, E., Thompson, M., & Annich, G.
- Venue
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-38
- ISSN
- 1529-7535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070635850
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation-based mock codes significantly correlate with improved pediatric patient cardiopulmonary arrest survival rates*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/pcc.0b013e3181e89270
- The paper
- Andreatta, P., Saxton, E., Thompson, M., & Annich, G. (2011). Simulation-based mock codes significantly correlate with improved pediatric patient cardiopulmonary arrest survival rates*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/pcc.0b013e3181e89270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.