Cited by 76Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Family-Based Crisis Intervention With Suicidal Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Wharff, Elizabeth A., Ginnis, Katherine B., Ross, Abigail M., White, Erina M., White, Matthew T., Forbes, Peter W.·2019·Pediatric Emergency Care

Abstract

Objective In current practice, treatment as usual (TAU) for suicidal adolescents includes evaluation, with little or no intervention provided in the emergency department (ED), and disposition, usually to an inpatient psychiatry unit. The family-based crisis intervention (FBCI) is an emergency psychiatry intervention designed to sufficiently stabilize suicidal adolescents within a single ED visit so that they may return home safely with their families. The objective of this article is to report efficacy outcomes related to FBCI for suicidal adolescents and their families. Methods A total of 142 suicidal adolescents (age, 13-18 years) and their families presenting for psychiatric evaluation to a large pediatric ED were randomized to receive FBCI or TAU. Patients and caregivers completed self-report measures of suicidality, family empowerment, and satisfaction with care provided at pretest, posttest, and 3 follow-up time points over a 1-month period. Results Patients randomized to FBCI were significantly more likely to be discharged home with outpatient follow-up care compared with their TAU counterparts (P Conclusions Family-based crisis intervention is a model of care for suicidal adolescents that may be a viable alternative to traditional ED care that involves inpatient psychiatric hospitalization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pec.0000000000001076

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on study-level results, adolescents who received family-based interventions had lower rates of re-presentation and were more likely to be linked to outpatient mental health services after discharge compared with adolescents who received treatment as usual.

    “Based on study-level results, adolescents who received interventions that were family-based had lower rates of re-presentation44 and were more likely to be linked to outpatient mental health services after discharge35 compared with adolescents who received treatment as usual.”
  • Suicide-related behavior was designated as a primary outcome in 1 study and a secondary outcome in 2 studies.

    “SRB was designated as a primary outcome in 1 study44 and a secondary outcome in 2 studies.35,38”
  • Re-presentation to acute care settings was designated as the primary outcome in zero studies and a secondary outcome in 2 studies.

    “Re-presentation to acute care settings was designated as the primary outcome in zero studies and a secondary outcome in 2 studies.38,44”
  • Parent or family involvement may be an important modification because of the prominent role families have during this developmental stage and the apparent link between family functioning and adolescent SITB.

    “For example, parent or family involvement may be an important modification44 because of the prominent role families have during this developmental stage and the apparent link between family functioning and adolescent SITB.52,53”
  • Only 3 studies had adequate-sized samples to compare treatment effects across groups; 2 of these used true randomization, and neither found significant between-group differences in suicide-related outcomes.

    “Only 3 studies35,42,44 had adequate-sized samples to compare treatment effects across groups; 2 of these studies35,44 used true randomization, and neither found significant between-group differences in suicide-related outcomes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wharff, E. A., Ginnis, K. B., Ross, A. M., White, E. M., White, M. T., & Forbes, P. W.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wharff, Elizabeth A.
  • Ginnis, Katherine B.
  • Ross, Abigail M.
  • White, Erina M.
  • White, Matthew T.
  • Forbes, Peter W.
Venue
Pediatric Emergency Care
Published
2019-03
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
170-175
ISSN
  • 0749-5161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1815
OpenAlex
W2592501324
Cited by
76
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Emergency Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
adolescent suicide, suicidal adolescents, family empowerment, client satisfaction, outpatient follow-up, inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, suicide prevention
MeSH terms
Recidivism, Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Crisis Intervention, Emergency Service, Hospital, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Patient Discharge, Suicide, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review