Cited by 18Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchHead and Neck Cancer StudiesEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Human Papillomavirus Type Distribution in Invasive Cervical Cancers From Madhya Pradesh: Implications for Vaccination Programs in Central India

Munjal, Kavita, Adamson, Christine S.-C., Rajendran, Vanitha, Nandedkar, Shirish, Cooper, Kumarasen, Evans, Mark F.·2014·International Journal of Gynecological Pathology

Abstract

Invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC) remains a leading cause of female mortality in India. There is a paucity of data about human papillomavirus (HPV) type distribution among ICCs from Central India. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ICC specimens (n=270 patients) from Madhya Pradesh state were screened for HPV by GP5/6 primer-based polymerase chain reaction followed by cycle sequencing and NCBI BLAST search. HPV was detected in 93.3% of the tumors. Thirteen types were detected: HPV16 (73.7%), HPV18 (11.9%), HPV45 (2.2%), HPV66 (1.5%), HPV35 (1.1%), and HPV56 (0.7%). HPV31, 51, 58, 59, 67, 82 and JEB2 were each seen in 1 case (0.4%). HPV16 was more common among women less than 40 yr than 40 yr or older (P=0.006), and HPV18 was more common in women aged 40 yr or older (P=0.013). Squamous cell carcinomas were more frequently HPV-positive than adenocarcinomas (P=0.01). HPV18 was more common in adenocarcinoma than in squamous cell carcinoma (P=0.02). These data contribute to the pan-India profile of HPV-type relationship to ICC and show the potential of current vaccines to greatly relieve (by up to 85.6%) the ICC burden in Central India. The findings are also suggestive that next-generation HPV vaccines might be designed on a regional basis rather than from compounded global data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000083

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munjal, K., Adamson, C. S.-C., Rajendran, V., Nandedkar, S., Cooper, K., & Evans, M. F.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Munjal, Kavita
Venue
International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
Published
2014-09
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
531-536
ISSN
0277-1691 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322424150
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecological Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
human papillomavirus, HPV genotype distribution, invasive cervical cancer, HPV16, HPV 18, HPV genotyping, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, Madhya Pradesh
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, India, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Vaccination, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review