Human Papillomavirus Type Distribution in Invasive Cervical Cancers From Madhya Pradesh: Implications for Vaccination Programs in Central India
Abstract
Invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC) remains a leading cause of female mortality in India. There is a paucity of data about human papillomavirus (HPV) type distribution among ICCs from Central India. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ICC specimens (n=270 patients) from Madhya Pradesh state were screened for HPV by GP5/6 primer-based polymerase chain reaction followed by cycle sequencing and NCBI BLAST search. HPV was detected in 93.3% of the tumors. Thirteen types were detected: HPV16 (73.7%), HPV18 (11.9%), HPV45 (2.2%), HPV66 (1.5%), HPV35 (1.1%), and HPV56 (0.7%). HPV31, 51, 58, 59, 67, 82 and JEB2 were each seen in 1 case (0.4%). HPV16 was more common among women less than 40 yr than 40 yr or older (P=0.006), and HPV18 was more common in women aged 40 yr or older (P=0.013). Squamous cell carcinomas were more frequently HPV-positive than adenocarcinomas (P=0.01). HPV18 was more common in adenocarcinoma than in squamous cell carcinoma (P=0.02). These data contribute to the pan-India profile of HPV-type relationship to ICC and show the potential of current vaccines to greatly relieve (by up to 85.6%) the ICC burden in Central India. The findings are also suggestive that next-generation HPV vaccines might be designed on a regional basis rather than from compounded global data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other parts of Central and west India have similar reports showing HPV 16 (72-73.6%) as the most predominant genotype followed by HPV18 (5-11.9%) in cervical carcinoma cases.
“Other parts of Central and west India also have similar reports showing HPV 16(72–73.6%) as the most predominant genotype followed by HPV18 (5–11.9%) in cervical carcinoma cases [18, 20].”
From HPV Genotypes distribution in Indian women with and without cervical carcinoma: Implication for HPV vaccination program in Odisha, Eastern India (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Senapati, R., Nayak, B., Kar, S. K., & Dwibedi, B. (2017) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-016-2136-4 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- Munjal, K., Adamson, C. S.-C., Rajendran, V., Nandedkar, S., Cooper, K., & Evans, M. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Vermont (US)
- Corresponding author
- Munjal, Kavita
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 531-536
- ISSN
- 0277-1691 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2322424150
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Gynecological Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Keywords
- human papillomavirus, HPV genotype distribution, invasive cervical cancer, HPV16, HPV 18, HPV genotyping, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, Madhya Pradesh
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, India, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Vaccination, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review