The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High-Grade Endometrial Carcinoma: Serous and Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinomas Have Different Immunophenotypes and Outcomes
Abstract
High-grade endometrial carcinomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors and include grade 3 endometrioid (EC-3), serous (SC), and clear cell carcinomas (CCC). There are conflicting data about the prognosis of these subtypes of high-grade endometrial carcinoma; this may be a result of lack of reproducibility in classifying tumor cell type. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in immunophenotype and outcome in a series of high-grade endometrial carcinomas, focusing on the comparison of EC-3 versus SC. We selected 180 endometrial carcinomas of SC, EC, or CCC type. No mixed carcinomas were included in the study. We chose the following immunohistochemical markers, estrogen receptor (ER), insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3), p16, p53, progesterone receptor (PR), and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) as being significantly differentially expressed in endometrial carcinoma subtypes. The tumors were stratified into 4 groups on the basis of their cell type and grade: EC grade 1 or 2, EC-3, SC, and CCC. Univariate survival analysis revealed significant differences in outcome between the 4 groups (P<0.0001), with significantly longer disease-specific survival for grade 1 or 2 EC versus EC-3 (P=0.0001), and EC-3 versus SC (P=0.0003). p16, PTEN, and IMP3 expression was observed more frequently in SC compared with EC-3 (P<0.0001, P=0.021, and P=0.031, respectively). These 3 markers showed the highest sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between EC-3 and SC, with receiver operating characteristics area under the curve of 0.85, 0.69, and 0.71, respectively. ER and p53 approached but did not reach significance for differential expression in EC-3 versus SC (P=0.055 and P=0.068, respectively). A combination of p16 and PTEN predicts EC-3 versus SC with a sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 96.8%. p16 and PTEN can aid in distinguishing between EC-3 and SC of the endometrium, and are superior to ER, PR, and p53 for this purpose. EC-3 carcinomas have a significantly better prognosis than SC carcinomas of the endometrium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Murali, R., Davidson, B., Fadare, O., Carlson, J. A., Crum, C. P., Gilks, C. B., Irving, J. A., Malpica, A., Matias-Guiu, X., McCluggage, W. G., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Gynecological Pathology · doi:10.1097/pgp.0000000000000491 · Cited by 278
Self-citationKamal, A. M., Bulmer, J. N., DeCruze, S. B., Stringfellow, H. F., Martin-Hirsch, P., & Hapangama, D. K. (2016) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2016.16 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Alkushi, A., Köbel, M., Kalloger, S. E., & Gilks, C. B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 343-350
- ISSN
- 0277-1691 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013008781
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Grade Endometrial Carcinoma: Serous and Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinomas Have Different Immunophenotypes and Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/pgp.0b013e3181cd6552
- The paper
- Alkushi, A., Köbel, M., Kalloger, S. E., & Gilks, C. B. (2010). High-Grade Endometrial Carcinoma: Serous and Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinomas Have Different Immunophenotypes and Outcomes. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/pgp.0b013e3181cd6552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.