Primary Intranasal Lining Injury Cause, Deformities, and Treatment Plan
Abstract
Background Nasal membranes may be injured by immune disease, infection, trauma, or cocaine. Destruction of the septum, vault and floor lining, external skin, upper lip, and adjacent structures follows. Methods Lining injuries caused by cocaine, Wegener granulomatosis, primary syphilis, leishmaniasis, septorhinoplasty, septal cancer excision and irradiation, corrosive inhalation, and foreign body and iatrogenic intubation injury were reviewed. The site and degree of injury were correlated with presentation and anatomical and functional abnormality. Results Damage may be isolated to the septum, creating a septal fistula with loss of dorsal and tip support and modest collapse of the dorsum and tip with columellar retraction, or the injury may extend onto the vaults and floor, leading to circumferential scar contracture and severe nasal shortening and lip retraction. Progressive disease, infection, or iatrogenic injury increases soft-tissue damage, causing external skin contraction or full-thickness necrosis. Conclusions Repair is determined by site, depth of injury, and clinical deformity--not cause. Lining necrosis and subsequent scar contraction, rather than structural compromise of the septum, are the primary causes of the severe deformity. If vault and floor lining injury is minimal, central support alone will restore dorsal and tip projection. Extensive loss requires release of scar contracture and replacement of the vault and floor lining with composite grafts, a microvasc…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Injuries to the nasal epithelium are relatively common.
“Injuries to the nasal epithelium are, however, relatively common26 and may expose the underlying cranial nerves to infection.”
From Chlamydia pneumoniae can infect the central nervous system via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves and contributes to Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chacko, A., Delbaz, A., Walkden, H., Basu, S., Armitage, C. W., Eindorf, T., Trim, L. K., Miller, E., West, N. P., St John, J. A., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06749-9 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Authors
- Menick, F. J., & Salibian, A.
- Affiliations
- St. Joseph Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1045-1056
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2334698429
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
- Keywords
- nasal deformity, scar contracture, nasal collapse, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, nasal foreign body, composite graft, microvascular flaps, forehead flap, nasal reconstruction
- MeSH terms
- Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Nasal Mucosa, Nasal Septum, Nose Deformities, Acquired, Rhinoplasty, Severity of Illness Index, Surgical Flaps, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Cocaine-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review