Cited by 39Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesHead and Neck Surgical Oncology

Primary Intranasal Lining Injury Cause, Deformities, and Treatment Plan

Menick, Frederick J., Salibian, Arthur·2014·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

Background Nasal membranes may be injured by immune disease, infection, trauma, or cocaine. Destruction of the septum, vault and floor lining, external skin, upper lip, and adjacent structures follows. Methods Lining injuries caused by cocaine, Wegener granulomatosis, primary syphilis, leishmaniasis, septorhinoplasty, septal cancer excision and irradiation, corrosive inhalation, and foreign body and iatrogenic intubation injury were reviewed. The site and degree of injury were correlated with presentation and anatomical and functional abnormality. Results Damage may be isolated to the septum, creating a septal fistula with loss of dorsal and tip support and modest collapse of the dorsum and tip with columellar retraction, or the injury may extend onto the vaults and floor, leading to circumferential scar contracture and severe nasal shortening and lip retraction. Progressive disease, infection, or iatrogenic injury increases soft-tissue damage, causing external skin contraction or full-thickness necrosis. Conclusions Repair is determined by site, depth of injury, and clinical deformity--not cause. Lining necrosis and subsequent scar contraction, rather than structural compromise of the septum, are the primary causes of the severe deformity. If vault and floor lining injury is minimal, central support alone will restore dorsal and tip projection. Extensive loss requires release of scar contracture and replacement of the vault and floor lining with composite grafts, a microvasc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0000000000000694

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menick, F. J., & Salibian, A.
Affiliations
St. Joseph Hospital (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2014-11
Volume
134
Issue
5
Pages
1045-1056
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334698429
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Keywords
nasal deformity, scar contracture, nasal collapse, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, nasal foreign body, composite graft, microvascular flaps, forehead flap, nasal reconstruction
MeSH terms
Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Nasal Mucosa, Nasal Septum, Nose Deformities, Acquired, Rhinoplasty, Severity of Illness Index, Surgical Flaps, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Cocaine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review