Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20Body Contouring and SurgeryBariatric Surgery and OutcomesBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of panniculectomy and/or abdominoplasty on quality of life: a retrospective cohort analysis of patient-reported outcomes.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Panniculectomy and abdominoplasty are uptrending procedures to address excess skin after weight loss which affects patient-reported quality of life. The authors aimed to identify factors associated with low preoperative quality of life, quantify the benefit of these procedures, and evaluate benefits across grades of obesity. METHODS: Patients seeking panniculectomy and abdominoplasty between 2018 and 2019 with a completed preoperative BODY-Q questionnaire were identified. Stratification by quality of life in tertiles for each BODY-Q domain allowed identification of characteristics associated with low quality of life using chi-square tests. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare preoperative to postoperative change in quality of life. Differences in quality of life by obesity class (1-2 vs. 3) were ascertained using chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients completed preoperative quality-of-life questionnaires. Preoperative factors associated with low quality of life included age older than 40 years, Black race, public insurance, hypertension, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class (all p < 0.05). Of patients who completed a preoperative BODY-Q and underwent surgery, 46 (63 percent) completed both surveys. Quality of life improved postoperatively across all domains ( p < 0.01). The presence of a surgical site occurrence (e.g., infection, delayed healing, hematoma, seroma) did not impact postoperative quality of life in any domain ( p > 0.05). Obesity classification did not affect change in quality of life preoperatively to postoperatively ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Quality of life is significantly lower at baseline in older, Black, publicly insured patients, and multimorbid patients, but improves dramatically after panniculectomy and abdominoplasty regardless of incidence of complications or degree of obesity. . CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0000000000009551

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Rios-Diaz, A. J., Morris, M. P., Elfanagely, O., Cunning, J. R., Davis, H., Shakir, S., Broach, R. B., & Fischer, J. P.
Affiliations
Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Venue
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2022-07-26
Volume
150
Issue
4
Pages
767e-775e
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4287577067
Cited by
20
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
panniculectomy, abdominoplasty, quality of life, obesity, patient-reported outcomes, postoperative outcomes, surgical complications, multimorbidity, racial disparities, public insurance
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Adult, Aged, Humans, Obesity, Postoperative Complications, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Abdominoplasty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.