Cited by 126Dermatologic Treatments and ResearchWound Healing and TreatmentsSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases

Scars: A Review of Emerging and Currently Available Therapies

Reish, Richard G., Eriksson, Elof·2008·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the investigation and potential introduction of several novel scar-reducing therapies to the market within the next several years, it is germane to review both the pathophysiology of scarring and the safety and efficacy of currently available and emerging therapeutic agents. METHODS: An extensive review of the English-language literature was conducted using the MEDLINE database. RESULTS: A comprehensive review of the pathophysiology of scarring and scar management, including both emerging and currently available therapies, was completed. Current clinical studies are limited by small sample sizes, lack of well-designed controls, and lack of standardized scar outcome measurement parameters. CONCLUSIONS: A prominent challenge in the study of scar management is the paucity of well-designed, large, randomized, controlled studies examining existing scar-reducing techniques. The greatest improvement in scar-reducing protocols likely entails a polytherapeutic strategy for management. Further investigation into the role of inflammation in scarring is paramount to the development of improved scar-reducing agents. There is a need for large controlled trials using a polytherapeutic strategy that combines existing and novel agents to provide a standardized evidence-based evaluation of efficacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0b013e318185d38f

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple treatment regimens for hypertrophic scars and keloids are practiced, but none are optimal and effective, and molecular-targeted therapeutics remain elusive.

    “Although multiple treatment regimens are practiced, including silicone gel sheeting, pressure therapy, corticosteroids, cryotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, laser therapy, and radiation, none of these are optimal and effective, and therapeutics based on molecular targets remain elusive (2).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 109 · Cited by 126

Authors
Reish, R. G., & Eriksson, E.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2008-10
Volume
122
Issue
4
Pages
1068-1078
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054674187
Cited by
126
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Keywords
scar treatment, treatment efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
Administration, Topical, Bandages, Cicatrix, Humans, Pressure, Wound Healing, Genetic Therapy, Cryotherapy, Silicone Gels, Laser Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review