Cited by 70Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesPectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment

Reoperation for Intracranial Hypertension in TWIST1-Confirmed Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome: A 15-Year Review

Open access
Woods, Roger H., Ul-Haq, Ehtesham, Wilkie, Andrew O. M., Jayamohan, Jayaratnam, Richards, Peter G., Johnson, David, Lester, Tracy, Wall, Steven A.·2009·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Saethre-Chotzen syndrome is a syndromic craniosynostosis defined by a genetic mutation affecting the TWIST1 gene on chromosome 7p21. It is typically associated with unicoronal or bicoronal synostosis, eyelid ptosis, dysmorphic external ears, and other variable facial and limb abnormalities. Surgical management of the craniosynostosis addresses the calvarial deformity and may relieve or reduce the risk of intracranial hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess surgical intervention, with particular consideration of the reoperation rate for intracranial hypertension, in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome patients. METHODS: A retrospective case note analysis was performed on all patients with a confirmed TWIST1 gene abnormality who attended the Oxford Craniofacial Unit over a 15-year period. Each patient's mutation and clinical features were recorded. Surgical intervention and sequelae were examined in greater detail. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with genetically confirmed Saethre-Chotzen syndrome were identified. All had craniosynostosis (bicoronal, 76 percent; unicoronal, 18 percent; bicoronal and sagittal, 6 percent), and the majority had eyelid ptosis, low frontal hairline, and external ear anomalies. Thirty-one patients had received surgical intervention. Nine of 26 patients (35 percent) with at least 12 months of follow-up after primary intervention and eight of 19 patients (42 percent) with at least 5 years of follow-up developed intracranial hypertension necessitating secondary calvarial surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite standard surgical intervention, patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome have a high rate (35 to 42 percent) of recurrent intracranial hypertension necessitating further surgical expansion. All patients with either bicoronal synostosis or unicoronal synostosis with syndromic features should be screened for TWIST1 mutations, as this confers a greater risk than nonsyndromic synostosis of the same sutures. Regular follow-up throughout the childhood years is essential.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0b013e3181a3f391

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with TWIST1 mutations have a higher risk of later developing raised intracranial pressure.

    “subjects with TWIST1 mutations are at higher risk for secondary development of raised ICP; 50”

    From Craniosynostosis (2011) · cites this paper as [50]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 70

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Jabs EW Epstein CJ Erickson RP Wynshaw-Boris A TWIST1 and the Saethre-Chotzen syndrome Inborn errors of development. The molecular basis of clinical disorders of morphogenesis 2008 474 81 Oxford University Press Oxford 2nd Ed.

Authors
Woods, R. H., Ul-Haq, E., Wilkie, A. O. M., Jayamohan, J., Richards, P. G., Johnson, D., Lester, T., & Wall, S. A.
Affiliations
Churchill Hospital (GB)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2009-06
Volume
123
Issue
6
Pages
1801-1810
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048390127
Cited by
70
References
35
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (078666)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, craniosynostosis, intracranial hypertension, reoperation, bicoronal synostosis, unicoronal synostosis, eyelid ptosis, external ear anomalies, syndromic craniosynostosis
MeSH terms
Acrocephalosyndactylia, Child, Preschool, Craniosynostoses, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Nuclear Proteins, Recurrence, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Gene Deletion, Point Mutation, Intracranial Hypertension, Twist-Related Protein 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review