Cited by 137Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Does Anxiety Affect Risk of Dementia? Findings From the Caerphilly Prospective Study

Gallacher, John, Bayer, Anthony, Fish, Mark, Pickering, Janet, Pedro, Sofia, Dunstan, Frank, Ebrahim, Shah, Ben-Shlomo, Yoav·2009·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Objective To examine the association of anxiety with incident dementia and cognitive impairment not dementia (CIND). Methods We conducted a prospective study of men aged 48 to 67 years at baseline anxiety assessment; we measured cognition 17 years later. We studied 1481 men who were either eligible for examination or were known to have dementia. Trait Anxiety was assessed using the Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Psychological distress was assessed using the 30-item general health questionnaire. Cognitive screening was followed by a clinical examination. Medical notes and death certificates of those not seen were also examined. Outcomes were CIND and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) dementia. Results Of 1160 men who were cognitively screened, 174 cases of CIND and 69 cases of dementia were identified. A further 21 cases of dementia were identified from medical records. After adjustment for age, vascular risk factors and premorbid cognitive function associations with higher anxiety (31st-95th centile) were for CIND odds ratio (OR) 2.31 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.20-4.44) and for dementia OR 2.37 (95% CI = 0.98-5.71). These associations were slightly stronger for nonvascular (OR = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.28-4.68) than for vascular impairment (OR = 1.94; 95% CI = 0.77-4.89). Analyses of change in cognitive performance, assessed by the Cambridge Cognitive Examination of the Elderly subscales found some evidence for decline in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0b013e3181a6177c

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 137

Authors
Gallacher, J., Bayer, A., Fish, M., Pickering, J., Pedro, S., Dunstan, F., Ebrahim, S., & Ben-Shlomo, Y.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Gallacher, John
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2009-07
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
659-666
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988104043
Cited by
137
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
anxiety, dementia risk, cognitive decline, memory decline, men, vascular dementia, psychological distress, depression, dementia risk factors
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Anxiety Disorders, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review