Marriage protects men from clinically meaningful elevations in C-reactive protein: results from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP)
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between marital status and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after accounting for a range of relevant of demographic, subjective, and objective health indicators and psychological variables. Minor elevations in CRP (>3 mg/L) are a nonspecific marker of systemic inflammation and predict the future onset of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP), a population-based study of community-dwelling older adults in the United States, were used to study CRP elevations. Home-based interviews were conducted with the entire NSHAP sample, a subset of whom provided whole blood samples for the CRP analyses. The final sample consisted of 1715 participants (n = 838 men) with an average age of 69.51 years. Multiple and logistic regression analyses were conducted, using CRP as a continuous and dichotomous outcome variable. RESULTS: Across the entire NSHAP sample, married men demonstrated the lowest levels of CRP. After adjusting for the competing predictors, marriage remained a unique protective factor against elevated CRP for men (odds ratio = 0.56, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.39-0.79). The absolute risk reduction (for being classified in the high-risk CRP group) associated with being a married man was roughly equivalent to that observed for adults who were normotensive, nonsmokers, and those with a normal body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Remaining married in late adulthood affords men unique and robust protection against elevated levels of CRP. The findings are discussed in terms of the pathways linking marital status and health outcomes among older adults.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among older adults, married men had lower CRP levels than previously married men, as well as married and unmarried women.
“Among older adults, married men had lower CRP levels than previously married men, as well as married and unmarried women”
From Close relationships, inflammation, and health (2010) · cites this paper as Sbarra, 2009
The CRP differences by marital status were not explained by mood, stress, loneliness, or social support, and none of these variables moderated the association.
“Notably, these CRP differences were not explained by mood, stress, loneliness, or social support, and none of these variables moderated the association between marital status and CRP levels”
From Close relationships, inflammation, and health (2010) · cites this paper as Sbarra, 2009
The size of the effect of marriage on CRP was comparable to that of other traditional risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, and obesity.
“the size of the effect of marriage on CRP was comparable to that of other traditional risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, and obesity”
From Close relationships, inflammation, and health (2010) · cites this paper as Sbarra, 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 73
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [65]Arias E United States life tables, 2004. National vital statistics reports 2007 56 9 National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, MD 18274319
- [69]Chrousos GP McCarty R Pacak K Cizza G Sternberg E Gold PW Kvetnansky R Stress: Basic mechanisms and clinical implications, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1995 771 New York Academy of Sciences New York
- Authors
- Sbarra, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sbarra, David A.
- ORCID
- Sbarra, David A.
- Venue
- Psychosomatic Medicine
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 828-835
- ISSN
- 0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3625249
- OpenAlex
- W2071792583
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG028454, R21AG028454, R01AG021487)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 074637, R03MH074637)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- marriage, marital status, C-reactive protein, systemic inflammation, older men, cardiovascular risk, social determinants of health, old age, psychosocial factors
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, C-Reactive Protein, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Inflammation, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, United States, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Marital Status
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review