Shoe Covers but Not Burnout? Making Burnout Reduction a Criteria for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Funding Would Protect Patients
Abstract
In the United States, hospitals must meet eligibility criteria to receive federal funding. Regulatory bodies, such as the Joint Commission, are approved by the government to give, or withhold, accreditation to hospitals. This accreditation is a requisite to continue receiving funding. Hospitals are frequently cited for items such as inadequate wearing of boot covers or covering of facial hair in the operating rooms. There are very little, if any, data to support an improvement in patient safety when these items are complied with. There is, however, a large amount of data showing the negative consequences for patient safety when providers are burned out. We therefore propose that regulatory agencies such as the Joint Commission require that hospital systems measure burnout and reduce concerning levels of burnout in their employees to continue receiving certification. We briefly review evidence-based methods that hospital systems might consider to accomplish this goal.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Loss of accreditation for hospitals can lead to damage to hospitals' image and patients' trust, and loss of eligibility for federal funding and insurance reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid, impacting financial stability.
“The loss of accreditation for hospitals can lead to severe consequences, including damage to hospitals’ image and to patients’ trust [352], and loss of eligibility for federal funding and insurance reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid, which can impact their financial stability [353,354].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [354]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Wolpaw, J. T., & Adair, K. C.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Duke University Health System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wolpaw, Jed T.
- Venue
- Journal of Patient Safety
- Published
- 2020-03-25
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-70
- ISSN
- 1549-8417 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-8425
- OpenAlex
- W3014081442
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Patient Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- physician burnout, hospital accreditation, Joint Commission, operating room attire, facial hair, patient safety, burnout reduction
- MeSH terms
- Burnout, Psychological, Humans, Patients, United States, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review