The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why don't physicians test for HIV? A review of the US literature
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In its 2006 HIV testing guidelines, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine testing in all US medical settings. Given that many physicians do not routinely test for HIV, the objective of this study was to summarize our current understanding of why US physicians do not offer HIV testing. DESIGN: A comprehensive review of the published and unpublished literature on HIV testing barriers was conducted. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in Pubmed using defined search terms. Other sources included Google, recent conference abstracts, and experts in the field. Studies were divided into three categories: prenatal; emergency department; and other medical settings. These categories were chosen because of differences in physician training, practice environment, and patient populations. Barriers identified in these sources were summarized separately for the three practice settings and compared. RESULTS: Forty-one barriers were identified from 17 reports. Twenty-four barriers were named in the prenatal setting, 20 in the emergency department setting, and 23 in other medical settings. Eight barriers were identified in all three categories: insufficient time; burdensome consent process; lack of knowledge/training; lack of patient acceptance; pretest counselling requirements; competing priorities; and inadequate reimbursement. CONCLUSION: US physicians experience many policy-based, logistical, and educational barriers to HIV testing. Although some barriers are exclusive to the practice setting studied, substantial overlap was found across practice settings. Some or all of these barriers must be addressed before the CDC recommendation for routine HIV testing can be realized in all US medical settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Barriers to HIV testing in Europe: a systematic review
Deblonde, J., De Koker, P., Hamers, F. F., Fontaine, J., Luchters, S., & Temmerman, M. (2010) · The European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckp231 · Cited by 357
Swendeman, D., & Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (2010) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e328336656a · Cited by 157
HIV treatment and care in resource‐constrained environments: challenges for the next decade
Eholié, S., Aoussi, F. E., Ouattara, I. S., Bissagnéné, E., & Anglaret, X. (2012) · Journal of the International AIDS Society · doi:10.7448/ias.15.2.17334 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Burke, R. C., Sepkowitz, K. A., Bernstein, K. T., Karpati, A. M., Myers, J. E., Tsoi, B. W., & Begier, E. M.
- Venue
- AIDS
- Published
- 2007-07-31
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1617-1624
- ISSN
- 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084307949
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why don't physicians test for HIV? A review of the US literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/qad.0b013e32823f91ff
- The paper
- Burke, R. C., Sepkowitz, K. A., Bernstein, K. T., Karpati, A. M., Myers, J. E., Tsoi, B. W., & Begier, E. M. (2007). Why don't physicians test for HIV? A review of the US literature. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0b013e32823f91ff
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.