The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seven-year experience of a primary care antiretroviral treatment programme in Khayelitsha, South Africa
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We report on outcomes after 7 years of a community-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) programme in Khayelitsha, South Africa, with death registry linkages to correct for mortality under-ascertainment. DESIGN: This is an observational cohort study. METHODS: Since inception, patient-level clinical data have been prospectively captured on-site into an electronic patient information system. Patients with available civil identification numbers who were lost to follow-up were matched with the national death registry to ascertain their vital status. Corrected mortality estimates weighted these patients to represent all patients lost to follow-up. CD4 cell count outcomes were reported conditioned on continuous virological suppression. RESULTS: Seven thousand, three hundred and twenty-three treatment-naive adults (68% women) started ART between 2001 and 2007, with annual enrolment increasing from 80 in 2001 to 2087 in 2006. Of 9.8% of patients lost to follow-up for at least 6 months, 32.8% had died. Corrected mortality was 20.9% at 5 years (95% confidence interval 17.9-24.3). Mortality fell over time as patients accessed care earlier (median CD4 cell count at enrolment increased from 43 cells/microl in 2001 to 131 cells/microl in 2006). Patients who remained virologically suppressed continued to gain CD4 cells at 5 years (median 22 cells/microl per 6 months). By 5 years, 14.0% of patients had failed virologically and 12.2% had been switched to second-line therapy. CONCLUSION: At a time of considerable debate about future global funding of ART programmes in resource-poor settings, this study has demonstrated substantial and durable clinical benefits for those able to access ART throughout this period, in spite of increasing loss to follow-up.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mocroft, A., Phillips, A., Gatell, J., Ledergerber, B., Fisher, M., Clumeck, N., Losso, M., Lazzarin, A., Fatkenheuer, G., & Lundgren, J. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60948-9 · Cited by 259
Cited by
Egger, M., Ekouevi, D. K., Williams, C., Lyamuya, R. E., Mukumbi, H., Braitstein, P., Hartwell, T., Graber, C., Chi, B. H., Boulle, A., et al. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr080 · Cited by 257
Self-citationMay, M., Boulle, A., Phiri, S., Messou, E., Myer, L., Wood, R., Keiser, O., Sterne, J. A., Dabis, F., & Egger, M. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60666-6 · Cited by 250
Self-citationFox, M. P., Bor, J., Brennan, A. T., MacLeod, W. B., Maskew, M., Stevens, W. S., & Carmona, S. (2018) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002589 · Cited by 103
the CobALT research team, Fairall, L., Petersen, I., Zani, B., Folb, N., Georgeu-Pepper, D., Selohilwe, O., Petrus, R., Mntambo, N., Bhana, A., et al. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2517-7 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Boulle, A., Van Cutsem, G., Hilderbrand, K., Cragg, C., Abrahams, M., Mathee, S., Ford, N., Knight, L., Osler, M., Myers, J., Goemaere, E., Coetzee, D., & Maartens, G.
- Venue
- AIDS
- Published
- 2010-02-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 563-572
- ISSN
- 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156440755
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seven-year experience of a primary care antiretroviral treatment programme in Khayelitsha, South Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/qad.0b013e328333bfb7
- The paper
- Boulle, A., Van Cutsem, G., Hilderbrand, K., Cragg, C., Abrahams, M., Mathee, S., Ford, N., Knight, L., Osler, M., Myers, J., Goemaere, E., Coetzee, D., & Maartens, G. (2010). Seven-year experience of a primary care antiretroviral treatment programme in Khayelitsha, South Africa. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0b013e328333bfb7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.