Cited by 115Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

Efficacy of human papillomavirus-based screen-and-treat for cervical cancer prevention among HIV-infected women

Kuhn, Louise, Wang, Chunhui, Tsai, Wei-Yann, Wright, Thomas C, Denny, Lynette·2010·AIDS

Abstract

Background Cervical cancer prevention should be provided as part of primary healthcare services for HIV-infected women but conventional screening programs are difficult to implement in low-resource settings. Here, we evaluate the efficacy among HIV-infected women of a simpler, screen-and-treat strategy in which all women with a positive screening test are treated with cryotherapy. Methods We conducted a randomized clinical trial of two screen-and-treat strategies among 6555 women in Cape Town, South Africa, among whom 956 were HIV-positive. Women were randomized to screen-and-treat utilizing either human papillomavirus DNA testing or visual inspection with acetic acid as the screening method or to a control group. Women were followed for up to 36 months after randomization with colposcopy and biopsy to determine the study endpoint of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher. Results In the control group, HIV-positive women had higher rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher detected by 36 months (14.9%) than HIV-negative women (4.6%) (P = 0.0006). Screen-and-treat utilizing human papillomavirus DNA testing significantly reduced cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher through 36 months in both HIV-positive (relative risk = 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.69) and HIV-negative women (relative risk = 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.50). Reductions in the visual inspection with acetic acid-and-treat group were less marked. Co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qad.0b013e32833e163e

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhn, L., Wang, C., Tsai, W.-Y., Wright, T. C., & Denny, L.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Kuhn, Louise
Venue
AIDS
Published
2010-10-23
Volume
24
Issue
16
Pages
2553-2561
ISSN
0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149936838
Cited by
115
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIDS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
cervical cancer prevention, women living with HIV, screen-and-treat, human papillomavirus DNA testing, visual inspection with acetic acid, cryotherapy, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, cervical cancer screening, resource-limited settings, Cape Town
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Colposcopy, DNA, Viral, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, South Africa, HIV Infections, Prevalence, Cryotherapy, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review