The Effect of Snuff (Smokeless Tobacco) on Disease Activity and Function in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experiences From the Better Anti-Rheumatic FarmacOTherapy, a Longitudinal Multicenter Study on Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
Abstract
Background It is not known whether snuff (moist smokeless tobacco) affects disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective This study aims to study the effect of snuff on disease activity and function in Swedish patients with early RA. Methods Between 1992 and 2005, 2800 adult patients were included in the Better Anti-Rheumatic FarmacOTherapy (BARFOT) early RA study in Sweden. Disease Activity Score 28 joints (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire, visual analog scale for general health, and drug treatment were registered at inclusion and at follow-up after 1, 2, and 5 years. European League Against Rheumatism response and remission criteria were applied at 1 year. In 2010, a self-completed postal questionnaire was sent to 2102 patients in the BARFOT study enquiring about lifestyle factors such as smoking and use of snuff. Three controls for each patient using snuff were identified. Results Fifty-one patients who used snuff were identified, together with 145 controls. When we adjusted for socioeconomic class, disease duration, and previous antirheumatic medication, the snuff users had lower DAS28 values at up to 6 months of follow-up than patients who had never smoked, and they had lower DAS28 values than previous smokers at up to 2 years of follow-up. No effect of snuff use on European League Against Rheumatism response was seen at up to 1 year. Conclusions Snuff users initially had lower DAS28 levels than never smokers and previous smokers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are lower values of Disease Activity Score 28 joints (DAS28) up to 6 months of follow-up in snus users compared to never-smokers.
“Lower values of Disease Activity Score 28 joints (DAS28) up to 6 months of followup in snus users compared to never-smokers (Andersson et al. 2013)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Andersson et al. 2013
Snuff users have lower Disease Activity Score 28 joints values up to 6 months compared to never-smokers and up to 2 years compared to former smokers; there is no effect of snuff use on European League Against Rheumatism response up to 1 year.
“snuff users had lower values of Disease Activity Score 28 joints (DAS28) up to 6 months of followup compared to never-smokers, as well as lower DAS28 values up to 2 years of follow-up compared to former smokers.Moreover, there was no effect of snuff use on European League Against Rheumatism response for up to 1 year (Andersson et al. 2013).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Andersson et al. 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Andersson, M. L. E., Bergman, S., & Söderlin, M. K.
- Venue
- JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-18
- ISSN
- 1076-1608
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review