A Comparison of 3T and 7T in the Detection of Small Parenchymal Veins Within MS Lesions
Abstract
Objective Histologic examination of multiple sclerosis (MS) brain lesions reveals heterogeneity including the presence or absence of a central blood vessel. Recent work has shown that T2* weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 7T allows the identification of small parenchymal veins within MS lesions. The aims of this study were (1) to compare whether a comparable sequence at 3T was also capable of demonstrating parenchymal veins within MS brain lesions, and (2) to investigate the potential of 7T T2* weighted imaging to differentiate between MS white matter lesions and age-related vascular lesions seen in controls. Materials and methods Seven patients with demyelinating brain disease and 7 healthy volunteers were scanned at 3T and 7T. Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images acquired at 3T were used to identify each brain lesion in each patient. A comparison of images from both field strengths was then made to determine whether white matter lesions seen in 3T FLAIR images could be identified in T2*-weighted images, and whether a central vein could be detected. Results A total of 358 brain lesions were identified in the brains of the 7 patients using 3T FLAIR images. The 3T T2* sequence detected 89% of FLAIR lesions compared with 94% using the 7T T2* sequence (P = 0.0002). A central vessel could be identified in 45% of visible lesions using 3T T2* and 87% of visible lesions using 7T T2* (P Discussion This study suggests that ultra high field imaging is advantageous in…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using T2* or susceptibility-weighted imaging, a central vein can be detected in most MS lesions, especially at higher field strengths.
“using T2* or susceptibilityweighted imaging a central vein can be detected in most MS lesions, especially at higher field strengths.77”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [77]
The presence of a central vein sign might help differentiate MS from white matter lesions due to small vessel disease, migraine, and healthy aging.
“and white matter lesions due to small vessel disease, migraine, and healthy aging.77”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [77]
MS lesions characteristically have a perivenular distribution.
“MS lesions characteristically have a perivenular distribution”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [77]
Cites
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · Cited by 11,888 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Tracking iron in multiple sclerosis: a combined imaging and histopathological study at 7 Tesla
Bagnato, F., Hametner, S., Yao, B., van Gelderen, P., Merkle, H., Cantor, F. K., Lassmann, H., & Duyn, J. H. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr278 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Cervical spinal cord susceptibility-weighted MRI at 7T: application to multiple sclerosis
Clarke, M. A., Witt, A. A., Robison, R. K., Fleishman, S., Combes, A. J. E., Houston, D., Prock, L. E., Sweeney, G., O'Grady, K. P., McKnight, C. D., et al. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120460 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tallantyre, E. C., Morgan, P. S., Dixon, J. E., Al-Radaideh, A., Brookes, M. J., Evangelou, N., & Morris, P. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Tallantyre, Emma C.
- Evangelou, Nikos
- Venue
- Investigative Radiology
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 491-494
- ISSN
- 0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016010598
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 10.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Investigative Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Multiple Sclerosis Society
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, brain lesions, T2-weighted imaging, ultra-high field MRI, 7T MRI, 3T MRI, white matter lesions, lesion heterogeneity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cerebral Veins, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review