Cited by 27Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Ultrasound in Telemedicine: Its Impact in High-Risk Obstetric Health Care Delivery

Long, Megan Chang, Angtuaco, Teresita, Lowery, Curtis·2014·Ultrasound Quarterly

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of Antenatal and Neonatal Guidelines, Education, and Learning System (ANGELS), a statewide telemedicine project, on health care delivery to patients with high-risk pregnancies in Arkansas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With institutional review board approval, a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective review, in which the requirement for informed patient consent was waived, was performed. The population studied is the Arkansas maternal Medicaid population. Data for evaluation were collected from maternal Medicaid claims, ANGELS administrative records, and birth records from the Arkansas Vital Statistics record system. Data collected from before the inception of ANGELS (2001-2003) were compared with data collected after the inception of ANGELS (2004-2007).Antenatal and Neonatal Guidelines, Education, and Learning System is a multidisciplinary, multifaceted telemedicine program designed in Arkansas to enhance high-risk obstetric health care delivery across the state. An essential component of the program is real-time interactive targeted level II ultrasound examination of patients. RESULTS: Since the inception of the ANGELS program in 2003, a growing number of telemedicine consultations and real-time ultrasound examinations are being performed every year. The number and percentage of high-risk pregnancies identified each year show a slight decrease since inception of the ANGELS program, and findings suggest that identification of high-risk pregnancies is shifting from the second trimester to the first trimester, but trends vary over time. CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal and Neonatal Guidelines, Education, and Learning System has created a telemedicine network across the state that has made possible, among many other things, access to real-time level II ultrasound examinations and consultations. This program has ultimately led to improved prenatal access across the state.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ruq.0000000000000073

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Long, M. C., Angtuaco, T., & Lowery, C.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
  • Long, Megan Chang
  • Angtuaco, Teresita
  • Lowery, Curtis
Venue
Ultrasound Quarterly
Published
2014-09
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
167-172
ISSN
0894-8771 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329991026
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
telemedicine, high-risk pregnancy, prenatal ultrasound, Medicaid, access to maternal health services, prenatal care, Arkansas, teleconsultation
MeSH terms
Adult, Arkansas, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Program Evaluation, Telemedicine, Pregnancy, High-Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review