Cited by 74Breast Implant and ReconstructionPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareWomen's cancer prevention and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do Patients and Providers Agree About the Most Important Facts and Goals for Breast Reconstruction Decisions?

Lee, Clara N., Hultman, C Scott, Sepucha, Karen·2010·Annals of Plastic Surgery

DOI 10.1097/sap.0b013e3181c01279

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy are some of the most difficult decisions a breast cancer patient makes. To make a good decision, the patient should have adequate knowledge of specific facts related to the decision, and the treatment chosen should be consistent with the patient's personal preferences or goals. We sought to identify the most important facts and goals for decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy, and to compare patients' and providers' perspectives. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of breast cancer survivors and providers. Participants rated and ranked the importance of facts and goals/concerns related to breast reconstruction after mastectomy. We compared patients' and providers' rankings using chi2 tests and compared ratings using t-tests. About 21 patients and 20 providers participated. Facts: Providers were more concerned about the impact of radiation on the success of the reconstruction than patients (60% vs. 24%, 95% CI of the difference: -64, -8). Thirty percent of providers placed the fact that women who do not have reconstruction are equally satisfied as women who have reconstruction in the top 3, whereas almost no patients did (30% vs. 5%, 95% CI: -47, -3). For all 3 of the facts about immediate versus delayed reconstruction, women placed a higher priority on these facts than providers did. GOALS: Patients placed greater importance on avoiding use of a prosthesis (33% vs. 0%, 95% CI of the difference: 13, 54). There was a trend toward less patient concern about "looking natural without clothes" compared to providers (24% vs. 40%, 95% CI of the difference: -12, 44). Significant variability exists among patients and between patients and providers, with respect to the most important facts and goals to guide decision making about reconstruction. Providers should ensure that women understand that reconstruction can be performed immediately or delayed, as well as the likelihood and type of complications. Surgeons should ask each woman which goals and concerns are most important to her. Specifically, they should inquire as to how women feel about using a prosthesis, and how they feel about their appearance with and without clothes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sap.0b013e3181c01279

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Two-Year Results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study
Alderman, A. K., Wilkins, E. G., Kim, H. M., & Lowery, J. C. (2002) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200206000-00015 · Cited by 603
The Psychological Effect of Mastectomy with or without Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Multicenter Study
Harcourt, D. M., Rumsey, N., Ambler, N., Cawthorn, S., Reid, C. D., Maddox, P. R., Kenealy, J., Rainsbury, R., & Umpleby, H. C. (2003) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000046249.33122.76 · Cited by 308
An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions
Sepucha, K., Ozanne, E. M., Silvia, K. A., Partridge, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2006) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.007 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Correlates of breast reconstruction
Morrow, M., Mujahid, M. S., Lantz, P. M., Janz, N. K., Fagerlin, A., Schwartz, K., Liu, L., Deapen, D., Salem, B., Lakhani, I., et al. (2005) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.21444 · Cited by 135
Satisfaction with outcome and attitudes towards scarring among women undergoing breast reconstructive surgery
Abu-Nab, Z., & Grunfeld, E. A. (2007) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.008 · Cited by 65
Variation in Physician-patient Discussion of Breast Reconstruction
Chen, J. Y., Malin, J., Ganz, P., Ko, C. Y., Tisnado, D., Tao, M., Timmer, M. J., Adams, J. L., & Kahn, K. (2008) · Journal of general internal medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0855-y · Cited by 44
Choices and information offered to patients undergoing immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a survey of patient opinion and self-assessed outcome
Shakespeare, V. A., & Hobby, J. (2001) · The Breast · doi:10.1054/brst.2001.0309 · Cited by 13

Show all 7 references

Sorted by citations

Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter
Mulley, A. G., Trimble, C., & Elwyn, G. J. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e6572 · Cited by 639
Patient-centered care: achieving higher quality by designing care through the patient’s eyes
Edgman‐Levitan, S., & Schoenbaum, S. C. (2021) · Israel Journal of Health Policy Research · doi:10.1186/s13584-021-00459-9 · Cited by 246
Collaboration and Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Clinicians in Preventive Health Care Decisions and US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations
US Preventive Services Task Force, Davidson, K. W., Mangione, C. M., Barry, M. J., Nicholson, W. K., Cabana, M. D., Caughey, A. B., Davis, E. M., Donahue, K. E., Doubeni, C. A., et al. (2022) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2022.3267 · Cited by 173
Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hallberg, H., Rafnsdóttir, S., Selvaggi, G., Strandell, A., Samuelsson, O. G., Stadig, I., Svanberg, T., Hansson, E., & Lewin, R. (2018) · Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery · doi:10.1080/2000656x.2017.1419141 · Cited by 134
Shared decision making in endocrinology: Present and future directions
Rodriguez-Gutierrez, R., Gionfriddo, M. R., Ospina, N. S., Maraka, S., Tamhane, S., Montori, V. M., & Brito, J. P. (2016) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00468-4 · Cited by 117
Shared Decision-making in the Emergency Department: Respecting Patient Autonomy When Seconds Count
Hess, E. P., Grudzen, C. R., Thomson, R., Raja, A. S., & Carpenter, C. R. (2015) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.12703 · Cited by 111
Shared Decision-Making in Diabetes Care
Tamhane, S. U., Rodríguez‐Gutiérrez, R., Hargraves, I. G., & Montori, V. M. (2015) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-015-0688-0 · Cited by 113
Priorities of patients with multimorbidity and of clinicians regarding treatment and health outcomes: a systematic mixed studies review
Sathanapally, H., Sidhu, M. S., Fahami, R., Gillies, C., Kadam, U. T., Davies, M. J., Khunti, K., & Seidu, S. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033445 · Cited by 96
Communicating with Patients on Health Care Evidence
DC, M. W., Alston, C., Paget, L., Halvorson, G. C., Permanente, K., Novelli, B., Guest, J., Union, C., McCabe, P. J., Relations, G. P., et al. (2012) · NAM Perspectives · doi:10.31478/201209d · Cited by 88
Multidisciplinary team decision-making in cancer and the absent patient: a qualitative study
Hamilton, D. W., Heaven, B., Thomson, R. G., Wilson, J. A., & Exley, C. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012559 · Cited by 81
Dialysis or conservative care for frail older patients: ethics of shared decision-making
Muthalagappan, S., Johansson, L., Kong, W. M., & Brown, E. A. (2013) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gft245 · Cited by 69
Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Causarano, N., Platt, J., Baxter, N. N., Bagher, S., Jones, J. M., Metcalfe, K. A., Hofer, S. O. P., O’Neill, A. C., Cheng, T., Starenkyj, E., et al. (2014) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2479-6 · Cited by 63
Making decisions about breast reconstruction: A systematic review of patient-reported factors influencing choice
Flitcroft, K. L., Brennan, M. E., & Spillane, A. J. (2017) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1555-z · Cited by 62
Women’s motives to opt for either implant or DIEP-flap breast reconstruction
Gopie, J. P., Hilhorst, M. T., Kleijne, A., Timman, R., Menke‐Pluymers, M. B. E., Hofer, S. O. P., Mureau, M. A. M., & Tibben, A. (2011) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2011.03.030 · Cited by 61
Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Cardiovascular Care
Hess, E. P., Coylewright, M. J., Frosch, D. L., & Shah, N. D. (2014) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.113.000351 · Cited by 58
Effects of A Novel Decision Aid for Breast Reconstruction
Luan, A., Hui, K. J. W. S., Remington, A. C., Liu, X., & Lee, G. (2016) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000000722 · Cited by 54
Patients believe that cosmetic procedures affect their quality of life: An interview study of patient-reported motivations
Waldman, A., Maisel-Campbell, A. L., Weil, A., Iyengar, S., Sacotte, K. A., Lazaroff, J. M., Kurumety, S. K., Shaunfield, S. L., Reynolds, K. A., Poon, E., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.059 · Cited by 54
Development of a decision guide to support the elderly in decision making about location of care: an iterative, user-centered design
Garvelink, M. M., Emond, J., Menear, M., Brière, N., Freitas, A., Boland, L., Perez, M. M. B., Blair, L., Stacey, D., & Légaré, F. (2016) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0040-0 · Cited by 45
“The inability of clinicians, patients, and caregivers to predict each other’s preferences is also reported in the treatment decision making literature [7, 37–39].”
Background
Choosing treatment and screening options congruent with values: Do decision aids help? Sub-analysis of a systematic review
Munro, S. B., Stacey, D., Lewis, K. B., & Bansback, N. J. (2015) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.026 · Cited by 44
Understanding what matters most to patients in acute care in seven countries, using the flash mob study design
van den Ende, E. S., Schouten, B., Kremers, M. N. T., Cooksley, T., Subbe, C. P., Weichert, I., van Galen, L. S., Haak, H. R., Kellett, J. G., Alsma, J., et al. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06459-4 · Cited by 40
Patients Should Define Value in Health Care: A Conceptual Framework
Kamal, R. N., Lindsay, S. E., & Eppler, S. L. (2018) · The Journal Of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.03.036 · Cited by 41
Addressing overuse in emergency medicine: evidence of a role for greater patient engagement
Newton, E. H. (2017) · Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine · doi:10.15441/ceem.17.233 · Cited by 35
Opportunities for personalised follow‐up care among patients with breast cancer: A scoping review to identify preference‐sensitive decisions
de Ligt, K. M., van Egdom, L. S. E., Koppert, L. B., Siesling, S., & van Til, J. A. (2019) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.13092 · Cited by 34
How does patient experience fit into the overall healthcare picture
BSc, L., & Rn, S. (2014) · Patient Experience Journal · doi:10.35680/2372-0247.1002 · Cited by 34
Shared decision making in cancer treatment: A Dutch national survey on patients' preferences and perceptions
Kuijpers, M. M. T., van Veenendaal, H., Engelen, V., Visserman, E., Noteboom, E. A., Stiggelbout, A. M., May, A. M., de Wit, N. J., van der Wall, E., & Helsper, C. W. (2021) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.13534 · Cited by 33
Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
Li, X., Meng, M., Zhao, J., Zhang, X., Yang, D., Fang, J., Wang, J., Liu, H., & Hao, Y. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s335080 · Cited by 26
The acceptability of PEGASUS: an intervention to facilitate shared decision-making with women contemplating breast reconstruction
Harcourt, D. M., Griffiths, C., Baker, E., Hansen, E., White, P., & Clarke, A. M. (2015) · Psychology Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2015.1051059 · Cited by 26
Development and preliminary user testing of the DCIDA (Dynamic computer interactive decision application) for ‘nudging’ patients towards high quality decisions
Bansback, N. J., LI, L. C., Lynd, L. D., & Bryan, S. (2014) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-14-62 · Cited by 27
Development and psychometric properties of a brief measure of subjective decision quality for breast cancer treatment
Resnicow, K., Abrahamse, P. H., Tocco, R. S., Hawley, S. T., Griggs, J. J., Janz, N. K., Fagerlin, A., Wilson, A., Ward, K. C., Gabram, S. G. A., et al. (2014) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-014-0110-x · Cited by 22
Patient‐Defined Goals for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment
Cai, Y., Tripuraneni, P. S., Gulati, A., Stephens, E. M., Nguyen, D., Durr, M. L., & Chang, J. L. (2022) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/01945998221075298 · Cited by 22
MEF: Multidimensional Examination Framework for Prioritization of COVID-19 Severe Patients and Promote Precision Medicine Based on Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approaches
Abdulkareem, K. H., Al‐Mhiqani, M. N., Dinar, A. M., Mohammed, M. A., Al-Imari, M. J., Al‐Waisy, A. S., Alghawli, A. S., & Al‐qaness, M. A. A. (2022) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering9090457 · Cited by 20
A study protocol of the effectiveness of PEGASUS: a multi-centred study comparing an intervention to promote shared decision making about breast reconstruction with treatment as usual
Harcourt, D. M., Paraskeva, N., White, P., Powell, J. E., & Clarke, A. M. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0543-0 · Cited by 18
A Novel Contraception Counseling and Shared Decision-Making Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents
Worthington, R. O., Oyler, J. L., Pincavage, A. T., Baker, N. A., Saathoff, M., & Rusiecki, J. M. (2020) · MedEdPORTAL · doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11046 · Cited by 17
Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
Platt, J., Baxter, N. N., Jones, J. M., Metcalfe, K. A., Causarano, N., Hofer, S. O. P., ONeill, A., Cheng, T., Starenkyj, E., & Zhong, T. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-199 · Cited by 14
‘They were aware of who I was as a person’: Patients’ and health professionals’ experiences of using the PEGASUS intervention to facilitate decision‐making around breast reconstruction
Tollow, P., Paraskeva, N., Clarke, A. M., White, P., Powell, J. E., Cox, D., & Harcourt, D. M. (2021) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.13464 · Cited by 14
Preconsultation Educational Group Intervention Can Address the Knowledge Gap in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
Zhong, T., Quong, W. L., Cheng, T., Kerrebijn, I., Butler, K., Hofer, S. O. P., O’Neill, A. C., Cil, T. D., & Metcalfe, K. A. (2020) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000002603 · Cited by 13
Evaluation of a Novel Preference Assessment Tool for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
Col, N. F., Solomon, A. J., Springmann, V., Ionete, C., Álvarez, E., Tierman, B., Kutz, C. F., Morales, I. B., Griffin, C., Ngo, L. H., et al. (2018) · International Journal of MS Care · doi:10.7224/1537-2073.2017-021 · Cited by 13
The impact on Australian women of lack of choice of breast reconstruction options: A qualitative study
Flitcroft, K. L., Brennan, M. E., & Spillane, A. J. (2019) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4974 · Cited by 13
Relationship Between Comorbid Conditions and Utilization Patterns of Immediate Breast Reconstruction Subtypes Post-mastectomy
Offodile, A. C., Wenger, J., & Guo, L. (2016) · The Breast Journal · doi:10.1111/tbj.12574 · Cited by 13
Equilibrium-Phase High Spatial Resolution Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 1.5T in Preoperative Imaging for Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
Versluis, B., Tuinder, S. M. H., Boetes, C., van der Hulst, R. R. W. J., Lataster, A., van Mulken, T. J. M., Wildberger, J. E., de Haan, M. W., & Leiner, T. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071286 · Cited by 11
Aesthetic Evaluation of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Fat Transfer vs. Implants
Wederfoort, J. L. M., Kleeven, A., Hommes, J. E., van Kuijk, S. M. J., van der Hulst, R. R. W. J., Piatkowski, A. A., M.D for The Breast trial investigators, Piatkowski, A. A., Wederfoort, J. L. M., Hommes, J. E., et al. (2022) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-022-03076-2 · Cited by 11
Advocate-BREAST: advocates and patients’ advice to enhance breast cancer care delivery, patient experience and patient centered research by 2025
O'Sullivan, C. C., Larson, N. L., Vierkant, R. A., Smith, M. L., Chauhan, C., Couch, F. J., Olson, J. E., Loprinzi, C. L., & Ruddy, K. J. (2024) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-024-01351-z · Cited by 8
Technique to Promote Symmetry in 2-Staged Bilateral Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Unilateral Postmastectomy Radiation
Roh, D. S., Treiser, M. D., Lafleur, E. H., & Chun, Y. S. (2017) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000000892 · Cited by 10
Shared decision making for persons with aphasia: a scoping review
Charamis, K., Parsons, C., Léonard, C., Domecq, M., Smith, F. M., Mayhew, K. J., & Boland, L. (2022) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2022.2039588 · Cited by 10
Decision-Making Styles and Levels of Involvement Concerning Breast Reconstructive Surgery: An Israeli Study
Kadmon, I., Noy, S., Billig, A., & Tzur, T. (2016) · Oncology nursing forum · doi:10.1188/16.onf.e1-e7 · Cited by 10
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Implementation of BREASTChoice, a Multilevel Breast Reconstruction Decision Support Tool With Personalized Risk Prediction
Politi, M. C., Myckatyn, T. M., Cooksey, K. E., Olsen, M. A. A., Smith, R. M., Foraker, R. E., Parrish, K. L., Phommasathit, C., Brock, G. N., Janse, S., et al. (2024) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000006354 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
A Novel Tool to Improve Shared Decision Making and Adherence in Multiple Sclerosis: Development and Preliminary Testing
Col, N. F., Álvarez, E., Springmann, V., Ionete, C., Morales, I. B., Solomon, A. J., Kutz, C. F., Griffin, C., Tierman, B., Livingston, T., et al. (2019) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/2381468319879134 · Cited by 9
Complications, patient-reported outcomes, and aesthetic results in immediate breast reconstruction with a dermal sling: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jepsen, C., Hallberg, H., Pivodic, A., Elander, A., & Hansson, E. (2019) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.046 · Cited by 8
Machine Learning Model to Predict Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Complications
Shaheen, M. S., McManus, B. T., Cullen, C. M., Chen, J., Momeni, A., Kuo, C., Tsai, P.-H., & Chung, K. C. (2026) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.7232 · Cited by 6
Interpersonal (mis)perceptions and (mis)predictions in patient–clinician interactions
Valentine, K. D., & Scherer, L. D. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.021 · Cited by 8
Patient-Guided Breast Reconstruction Education
Pestana, I. A. (2020) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.9070 · Cited by 6
Tendency to breast reconstruction after breast mastectomy among Iranian women with breast cancer.
Shandiz, F. H., Najafi, M. N., Shaye, Z. A., Salehi, M., & Salehi, M. (2015) · PubMed Central · Cited by 5
When Less is More
Kamzan, A. D., & Ng, E. (2021) · Advances in Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.yapd.2021.05.013 · Cited by 6
Tissue Expander Overfilling
Treiser, M. D., Lahair, T., & Carty, M. J. (2016) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000000594 · Cited by 5
Recent advances and educational strategies in diagnostic imaging for temporomandibular disorders: a narrative literature review
Zhao, R., Xiong, X., Li, Z., Zhang, L., Yang, H., & Ye, Z. (2025) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1597312 · Cited by 4
Techniques to Refine the Upper Outer Breast Aesthetic Subunit in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction:The Lateral Capsular Flap
DeGeorge, B. R., & Campbell, C. A. (2016) · Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1177/229255031602400211 · Cited by 4
Issues in access to end-of-life care in low-resource areas
Jain, Y. K., & Phutke, G. (2017) · Indian Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.20529/ijme.2017.091 · Cited by 3
Perceptions of Surgical Drains among Breast Reconstruction Patients and Health Care Staff: A Qualitative Survey Study
Tian, W. M., Rames, J. D., Schroeder, B. E., Dunworth, K., Yi, V. N., Tran, M. A., Gallagher, J., Bachelder, R. E., & Hollenbeck, S. T. (2024) · Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery · doi:10.1055/a-2332-0444 · Cited by 3
A Qualitative Study of Patient Themes for the Quality of the Total Joint Arthroplasty Experience
Amanatullah, D. F., Eppler, S. L., Shah, R. F., Mertz, K. C., Roe, A. K., Murasko, M. J., & Kamal, R. N. (2021) · Orthopedics · doi:10.3928/01477447-20210217-01 · Cited by 2
Scoping review of experiences of sexual minority women treated for breast cancer
Arthur, E. K., Ridgway-Limle, E. A., Krok‐Schoen, J. L., Boehmer, U., Battle‐Fisher, M., & Lee, C. N. (2024) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2024.2323471 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
The Metamorphosis of Patient Priorities Throughout the Breast Reconstruction Process
Davison, S. P., Ellor, M., & LaBove, G. (2024) · Aesthetic Surgery Journal · doi:10.1093/asj/sjae088 · Cited by 2
ASO Author Reflections: Decision Support Tools Are Needed to Address Dissatisfaction Among Women Seeking Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction
Shammas, R. L., Greenup, R. A., & Hollenbeck, S. T. (2021) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-021-10789-2 · Cited by 2
Outcomes of prosthetic and orthotic use in individuals with a minor lower extremity amputation: A scoping review
Dami, A., Mahé-Duverger, É., Acien, M., Blanchette, V., & Moisan, G. (2025) · Prosthetics and Orthotics International · doi:10.1097/pxr.0000000000000486 · Cited by 1
Confronting Evidence: Patient-Centred Care and the case for Shared Decision-MakingPreprint
Ryan, P., & Vaughan, D. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 1
Le roman de antar : themes et personnages
Cherkaoui, D. (1997)
Quality and safety of acute hospital care for older patients
Schouten, B. (2024) · doi:10.5463/thesis.412
Guía de Procedimientos en Cirugía Plástica Reconstructiva Vol. 6
Vélez, G. G. P., Acuña, R. A. L., Delgado, K. E. A., Molina, C. M. G., Suarez, M. E. C., López, G. L. R., Castro, M. F. Z., Aldaz, M. D. R., Mayorga, S. F. V., Navarrete, S. J. M., et al. (2024) · Juan Cuevas eBooks · doi:10.56470/978-9942-650-91-7
Positive and negative framing of complication risk and long-term outcomes influences decision-making in hip and knee arthroplasty
Boyle, A. B., & Sunstein, C. R. (2024) · The Surgeon · doi:10.1016/j.surge.2024.12.006
Great Debate: Does Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy Offer Better Survival than Mastectomy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer?
Douglas, S. R., Margenthaler, J. A., McGuire, K. P., & Hwang, E. S. (2025) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-025-17333-6
Shared decision making in plastic surgery
Kamran, R., Peck, L. J., Ardouin, K., & Rodrigues, J. N. (2025) · doi:10.1093/med/9780198897804.003.0050
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Unilateral Breast Cancer: Histopathological Yield and Patient Reported Outcomes from a Single Institution Experience
Arshad, Q. U. A. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medical Research · doi:10.46889/jcmr.2025.6216
Aligning Patient and Surgeon Aesthetic Priorities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study
Andresen‐Lorca, B., Heredia‐Alcalde, I., Alvedro‐Ruiz, P., García-García, M., Trapero, A., & Pérez-del-Caz, M. D. (2025) · Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1055/s-0045-1811167
“Pink is my least favorite color”: experiences of sexual minority women and partners navigating breast cancer
Arthur, E. K., Gandy, M. E., Sette, E., Fuller, J. A., Flora, L. K., Applegate, J. M., Suchland, J., Klakos, K., Battle‐Fisher, M., & Lee, C. N. (2025) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2025.2567399
Self-citation
Additional file 1 of Understanding what matters most to patients in acute care in seven countries, using the flash mob study design
van den Ende, E. S., Schouten, B., Kremers, M. N. T., Cooksley, T., Subbe, C. P., Weichert, I., van Galen, L. S., Haak, H. R., Kellett, J., Alsma, J., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14623457

Authors: Lee, C. N., Hultman, C. S., & Sepucha, K.
Affiliations: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author: Lee, Clara N.
Hultman, C Scott
ORCID: Lee, Clara N.
Sepucha, Karen
Venue: Annals of Plastic Surgery
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published: 2010-05
Volume: 64
Issue: 5
Pages: 563-566
ISSN: 0148-7043 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1097/sap.0b013e3181c01279
OpenAlex: W1972906878
Cited by: 74
References: 7
Citations by year: 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI: 2.36
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Annals of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR025746)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords: breast reconstruction, breast cancer, mastectomy, shared decision-making, patient-provider agreement, patient preferences, prosthesis, patient satisfaction, breast cancer survivors
MeSH terms: Breast Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Esthetics, Female, Goals, Humans, Mastectomy, Physician-Patient Relations, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, Chi-Square Distribution, Mammaplasty, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Do Patients and Providers Agree About the Most Important Facts and Goals for Breast Reconstruction Decisions?

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks