The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The Medial Subcoronoid Process Region as a Novel Source of Bone Grafts in Orthognathic Surgery and Genioplasty
Abstract
Background: Since 2012, the authors have adopted the medial subcoronoid process bone interpositional grafting in OGS and genioplasty procedures. The purpose of this study was to present the technical details and clinical outcomes of this alternative bone interpositional grafting for LeFort I and chin osteotomies. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 50) who underwent single-splint bimaxillary OGS with or without genioplasty and received medial subcoronoid bone interpositional grafting were included. Standardized facial and intraoral photographs at early and late postoperative periods (12.2 ± 3.3 and 44.8 ± 8.4 months postsurgery, respectively) were blindly rated to assess facial symmetry, chin, and occlusion status based on qualitative rating scales. Complication and reoperation rates were also reviewed. Results: The medial subcoronoid bone interpositional grafts were adopted to stabilize different LeFort I maxillary movement types or lengthening/advancing genioplasty (36 and 14 patients, respectively). Overall, the early facial symmetry, chin, and occlusion status were maintained at late evolutions. None of the patients had donor-site or bone graft-related complications (i.e., bad split, undesired mandible fracture, infection, fibrous union, nonunion, and/or permanent neurosensory deficit) or revisionary surgery during follow-up. Conclusion: The medial subcoronoid process bone grafting was a feasible alternative for bone interpositional defects of LeFort I and chin osteotomies with no significant morbidity and avoiding secondary donor sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Yu, 2009, Single-splint technique in orthognathic surgery: intraoperative checkpoints to control facial symmetry, Plast Reconstr Surg, 124, 879, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03842 · DOI
- Bergeron, 2008, Single-splint technique for correction of severe facial asymmetry: correlation between intraoperative maxillomandibular complex roll and restoration of mouth symmetry, Plast Reconstr Surg, 122, 1535, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818820d8 · DOI
- Liao, 2010, Presurgical orthodontics versus no presurgical orthodontics: treatment outcome of surgical-orthodontic correction for skeletal class III open bite, Plast Reconstr Surg, 126, 2074, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f52710 · DOI
- Posnick, 2018, Primary maxillary deficiency dentofacial deformities: occlusion and facial esthetic surgical outcomes, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 76, 1966, 10.1016/j.joms.2018.02.022 · DOI
- Posnick, 2018, Primary mandibular deficiency dentofacial deformities: occlusion and facial aesthetic surgical outcomes, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 76, 2209.e1, 10.1016/j.joms.2018.06.009 · DOI
- Posnick, 2015, Use of allogenic (iliac) corticocancellous graft for Le Fort I interpositional defects: technique and results, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 73, 168.e1, 10.1016/j.joms.2014.09.002 · DOI
- Alyahya, 2019, Bone grafting in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 48, 322, 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.08.014 · DOI
- Honda, 2005, The medial surface of the mandible as an alternative source of bone grafts in orthognathic surgery, J Craniofac Surg, 16, 123, 10.1097/00001665-200501000-00024 · DOI
- Tessier, 2005, Autogenous bone grafts and bone substitutes: tools and techniques: I. A 20,000-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery, Plast Reconstr Surg, 116, 6S, 10.1097/01.prs.0000173862.20563.12 · DOI
- Tessier, 2005, Complications of harvesting autogenous bone grafts: a group experience of 20,000 cases, Plast Reconstr Surg, 116, 72S, 10.1097/01.prs.0000173841.59063.7e · DOI
- Sabhlok, 2014, Applications of coronoid process as a bone graft in maxillofacial surgery, J Craniofac Surg, 25, 577, 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000624 · DOI
- Hunsuck, 1968, A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism, J Oral Surg, 26, 250
- Wu, 2019, The outcome of skeletofacial reconstruction with mandibular rotation for management of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity: a three-dimensional computer-assisted investigation, Sci Rep, 9, 13337, 10.1038/s41598-019-49946-9 · DOI
- Wang, 2017, Orthognathic surgery with simultaneous autologous fat transfer for correction of facial asymmetry, Plast Reconstr Surg, 139, 693, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003113 · DOI
- Ko, 2013, Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 71, e215, 10.1016/j.joms.2012.12.025 · DOI
- Ko, 2018, Enhanced surgical outcomes in patients with Skeletal Class III facial asymmetry by 3-dimensional surgical simulation, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 76, 1073, 10.1016/j.joms.2017.09.009 · DOI
- Chen, 2017, Mandibular contouring during orthognathic surgery using the modified Hunsuck technique, J Craniofac Surg, 28, 239, 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003165 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, C.-F., Denadai, R., Pascasio, D. C. G., Chen, Y.-C., & Chen, Y.-R.
- Venue
- Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 564-567
- ISSN
- 1049-2275
- 1536-3732
- Cited by
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Medial Subcoronoid Process Region as a Novel Source of Bone Grafts in Orthognathic Surgery and Genioplasty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/scs.0000000000006163
- The paper
- Yao, C.-F., Denadai, R., Pascasio, D. C. G., Chen, Y.-C., & Chen, Y.-R. (2020). The Medial Subcoronoid Process Region as a Novel Source of Bone Grafts in Orthognathic Surgery and Genioplasty. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000006163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
