The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Gingival Sulcus Incision for Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture
Abstract
The usual surgical approaches for zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture are subciliary incision, transconjunctival incision, eyebrow incision, lateral canthal incision, coronal incision, preauricular incision, and superior gingivobuccal incision. In the intraoral approach, a horizontal mucoperiosteal incision is performed at the superior gingivobuccal region, and sometimes, includes the upper labial frenum. This may cause discomfort in the oral cavity because of postoperative scarring and shortening of the upper labial frenum. To avoid these complications, the authors performed a novel approach using gingival sulcus incision instead of oral mucosal incision to treat 5 zygomatic fractures. The authors evaluated the regression of the gingival interdental papillae, gingival swelling, and gingival perception at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the operation. The regression of the gingival papillae and gingival swelling disappeared 3 months and 1 month after the operation, respectively. No paresthesia was observed in any of the cases. The gingival sulcus approach can lead to scarless results and contribute considerably to the aesthetic appearance of the oral cavity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Zingg, 1992, Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures: a review of 1,025 cases, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 50, 778, 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90266-3 · DOI
- Manson, 1985, Midface fractures: advantages of immediate extended open reduction and bone grafting, Plast Reconstr Surg, 76, 1, 10.1097/00006534-198507000-00001 · DOI
- Lee, 2006, Single transconjunctival incision and two-point fixation for the treatment of noncomminuted zygomatic complex fracture, J Korean Med Sci, 21, 1080, 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.6.1080 · DOI · Paper page
- Choi, 2013, Feasibility of 4-point fixation using the preauricular approach in a zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture, J Craniofac Surg, 24, 557, 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182700d23 · DOI
- Miller, 1985, A classification of marginal tissue recession, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 5, 8
- Peck, 1992, The gingival smile line, Angle Orthod, 62, 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Kokubo, K., Katori, N., Fujii, A., Kitamura, S., Ninomiya, R., Haga, S., & Maegawa, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- Published
- 2020-07-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e781-e786
- ISSN
- 1049-2275
- 1536-3732
- Cited by
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gingival Sulcus Incision for Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/scs.0000000000006749
- The paper
- Kokubo, K., Katori, N., Fujii, A., Kitamura, S., Ninomiya, R., Haga, S., & Maegawa, J. (2020). Gingival Sulcus Incision for Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000006749