Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Causes of Reoperation Consultation and Clinical Review of Actual Reoperation After Previous Orthognathic Surgery

Kim, Ci Young, Ha, Sung-Ho, Lee, Pa Ran, Baek, Seung-Hak, Choi, Jin-Young·2023·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000009271
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the causes of reoperation consultation, and the actual percentage and procedures of reoperation after previous orthognathic surgery. Methods: The samples consisted of 30 patients who visited our clinic for reoperation consultation from October 2015 to September 2021 (6 males and 24 females; mean age at reoperation consultation, 28.4 y). Patient’s causes of reoperation consultation were divided into “esthetic dissatisfaction,” “airway changes,” “temporomandibular disorders,” “uncomfortable occlusion,” and “other complications”. In terms of esthetic dissatisfaction, the more detailed esthetic problem was evaluated by the clinical chart, facial photographs, and radiographs. In patients who actually underwent reoperation, the actual percentage and procedures of reoperation were investigated. Results: The most prevalent causes for reoperation consultation were “esthetic dissatisfaction” (n = 21, 70.0%), followed by “airway changes” (n = 11, 36.7%), “uncomfortable occlusion” (n = 8, 26.7%), “other complications” (n = 5, 16.7%), and “temporomandibular disorder” (n = 4, 13.3%). Less than half of patients actually underwent reoperation (n = 13, 43.3%). Actual reoperation procedures included minor revision surgery, reconstruction surgery, or complete reoperation according to the patient’s need. In case of complete reoperation, more accurate and predictable results were obtained by using virtual surgical planning, customized surgical guides, titanium surgical plates made with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing technique, and a 3-dimensional printing method. Conclusion: It is important to communicate with patients about expectations for facial esthetic improvement by orthognathic surgery for obtaining the patient’s postoperative satisfaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0000000000009271

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Kim, C. Y., Ha, S.-H., Lee, P. R., Baek, S.-H., & Choi, J.-Y.
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2023-03-16
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
e437-e442
ISSN
1049-2275
DOI
10.1097/scs.0000000000009271
Cited by
4
References
25
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.