Cited by 31Facial Trauma and Fracture ManagementReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Modified Gillies Approach for Zygomatic Arch Fracture Reduction in the Setting of Bicoronal Exposure

Abstract

Zygomatic arch fractures are common injuries, occurring in isolation in 5% of all patients with facial fractures and in 10% of patients with any fracture to the zygomaticomaxillary complex. Isolated noncomminuted depressed zygomatic arch fractures are easily treated with the minimally invasive Gillies approach, which most often provides long-term stability. However, zygomatic arch fractures often occur in conjunction with zygomaticomaxillary complex, Le Fort, calvarial, and naso-orbitoethmoid fractures. In situations requiring a bicoronal incision to address concomitant injuries, zygomatic arch fractures are frequently treated with wide dissection and rigid fixation. Using principles obtained from isolated arch fractures, we present for the first time to our knowledge the use of a modified Gillies approach to noncomminuted zygomatic arch fractures in a case requiring a bicoronal incision. With the deep temporal fascia exposed from the reflected bicoronal flap, a 1-cm horizontal incision is made within the deep temporal fascia allowing a Gillies elevator to easily reduce the arch fracture in a plane between the deep layer of the deep temporal fascia and the temporalis muscle. This technique exploits the advantages of the traditional Gillies approach, preserving fascial attachments, avoiding neurovascular injury, and obviating the need for rigid fixation. Moreover, this method saves time and money and decreases morbidity. Our modified Gillies approach to zygomatic arch fractures in the setting of a bicoronal incision can be applied to a wide range of cases because of the frequency with which arch fractures occur with concomitant craniomaxillofacial injuries requiring wide exposure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0b013e31824dd5c3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 31

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Gillies, 1927, Br J Surg, 14, 651, 10.1002/bjs.1800145612 · DOI
  2. Schroeder, 1982, HNO, 30, 174
  3. Hwang, 1999, J Craniofac Surg, 10, 439, 10.1097/00001665-199909000-00010 · DOI
  4. Quinn, 1977, J Oral Surg, 35, 321
  5. Courtney, 1999, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 37, 464, 10.1054/bjom.1999.0010 · DOI
  6. Stanley, 1989, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 115, 1459, 10.1001/archotol.1989.01860360061018 · DOI
  7. Stevens, 1993, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 51, 1158, 10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80460-4 · DOI
  8. Honig, 2004, J Craniofac Surg, 15, 986, 10.1097/00001665-200411000-00019 · DOI
  9. Randall, 1996, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 105, 68, 10.1177/000348949610500112 · DOI
  10. El-Hadidy, 2005, Plast Reconstr Surg, 116, 853, 10.1097/01.prs.0000176896.60094.c8 · DOI
  11. Czerwinski, 2005, Plast Reconstr Surg, 115, 1848, 10.1097/01.PRS.0000165079.36556.57 · DOI
  12. Rohrich, 1995, Plast Reconstr Surg, 96, 570, 10.1097/00006534-199509000-00008 · DOI
  13. Gordon, 2011, Aesthetic Surg J, 31, 827, 10.1177/1090820X11417425 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Swanson, E., Vercler, C., Yaremchuk, M. J., & Gordon, C. R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Swanson, Edward
  • Vercler, Christian
  • Yaremchuk, Michael J.
  • Gordon, Chad R.
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2012-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
859-862
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056843944
Cited by
31
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Keywords
zygomatic arch fracture, zygomaticomaxillary complex, deep temporal fascia, fracture reduction, Le Fort fractures, calvarial fractures
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Fasciotomy, Facial Muscles, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Radiography, Zygoma, Zygomatic Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review