Effect of preoperative diabetes management on glycemic control and clinical outcomes after elective surgery
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative diabetes management can improve glycemic control and clinical outcomes after elective surgery. Background There is lack of data on the importance of diabetes treatment before elective surgery. Diabetes is often ignored before surgery and aggressively treated afterwards. Methods Patients with diabetes were identified and treated proactively before their scheduled surgeries. Data for all elective surgeries over 2 years before and 2 years after implementation of the program were collected. Results Out of 31,392 patients undergoing first surgery, 3909 had diabetes; 2072 before and 1835 after the program. Mean blood glucose on the day of surgery was 146.4 ± 51.9 mg/dL before and 139.9 ± 45.6 mg/dL after the program (P = 0.0028). Proportion of patients seen by the inpatient diabetes team increased. Mean blood glucose during hospital stay was 166.7 ± 42.9 mg/dL before and 158.3 ± 46.6 mg/dL after program (P Conclusions Preoperative and inpatient diabetes management improves glycemic control on the day of surgery and postoperatively and decreases the incidence of hypoglycemia. These changes may eventually improve clinical outcomes. Although statistically significant, the decrease in LOS was of equivocal clinical significance in this study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current data suggest an optimal A1C goal between 7% and 8% preoperatively, as it is associated with better glycemic management in the perioperative period and decreased length of hospital stay.
“Current data also suggest an optimal A1C goal between 7% and 8% preoperatively, as it is associated with better glycemic management in the perioperative period and decreased length of hospital stay (139,141-144).”
From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [139]
Overall evidence supports preadmission treatment of hyperglycemia in people scheduled for elective surgery as an effective means of reducing adverse outcomes.
“Overall evidence supports preadmission treatment of hyperglycemia in people scheduled for elective surgery as an effective means of reducing adverse outcomes (139,140).”
From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [139]
Cites
Validation of a combined comorbidity index
Charlson, M., Szatrowski, T. P., Peterson, J., & Gold, J. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5 · Cited by 6,587 · see citing works
Pasquel, F. J., Gomez-Huelgas, R., Anzola, I., Oyedokun, F., Haw, J. S., Vellanki, P., Peng, L., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-1835 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*, Bajaj, M., McCoy, R. G., Balapattabi, K., Bannuru, R. R., Bellini, N. J., Bennett, A. K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., ChallaSivaKanaka, S., et al. (2026) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc26-s016 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationThe financial impact of an inpatient diabetes management service
Haque, W. Z., Demidowich, A. P., Sidhaye, A., Golden, S. H., & Zilbermint, M. (2021) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-020-01374-0 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Inpatient hyperglycemia and transitions of care: A systematic review
Lansang, M. C., Zhou, K., & Korytkowski, M. T. (2021) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2021.01.016 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garg, R., Schuman, B., Bader, A., Hurwitz, S., Turchin, A., Underwood, P., Metzger, C., Rein, R., & Lortie, M.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garg, Rajesh
- Schuman, Brooke
- Hurwitz, Shelley
- Turchin, Alexander
- Metzger, Cheyenne
- Rein, Raquel
- Lortie, Meghan
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 858-862
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1140
- OpenAlex
- W2619834389
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
- Keywords
- glycemic control, elective surgery, hypoglycemia, length of hospital stay, perioperative care, postoperative outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Length of Stay, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Preoperative Care, Incidence, Hospital Mortality, Elective Surgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review