Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospective Assessment of the Abdominal Hernia‐Q (AHQ)‐Patient Burden, Reliability, and Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life in Hernia Repair

Patel, Viren, Cunning, Jessica R., Rios-Diaz, Arturo J., Mauch, Jaclyn T., Nathan, Shelby L., Messa, Charles A., Whitely, Cutler B., Kozak, Geoffrey M., Broach, Robyn B., Fischer, John P.·2022·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

Objective: This study assesses the user burden, reliability, and longitudinal validity of the AHQ, a novel VH patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM). Background: We developed and psychometrically validated the AHQ as the first VH-specific, stakeholder-informed PROM. Yet, there remains a need to assess the AHQ's clinical applicability and further validate its psychometric properties. Methods: To assess patient burden, pre- and postoperative patients were timed while completing the corresponding AHQ form. To measure test-retest reliability, a subset of patients completed the AHQ within a week of initial completion, and consecutive responses were correlated. Lastly, patients undergoing VH repair were prospectively administered the pre- and postoperative AHQ forms, the Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey and the Short Form-12 both preoperatively and at postoperative intervals, up to over a year after surgery. Quality-of-Life scores were correlated from the 3 PROMs and effect sizes were compared using analysis of normal variance. Results: Median response times for the pre- and postoperative AHQ were 1.1 and 2.7 minutes, respectively. The AHQ demonstrates high test-retest reliability coefficients for pre- and postoperative instruments (r = 0.91, 0.89). The AHQ appropriately and proportionally measures expected changes following surgery and significantly correlates with all times points of the Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey and Short Form-12 MS and 4/5 (80%) SF12-PS. Conclusion: The AHQ is a patient-informed, psychometrically-validated, clinical instrument for measuring, quantifying, and tracking PROMs in VH patients. The AHQ exhibits low response burden, excellent reliability, and effectively measures hernia-specific changes in quality-of-Life following ventral hernia repair.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0000000000004713

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Le Huu, 2012, Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional hernia, J Visc Surg, 149, e3, 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.05.004 · DOI
  2. Hodges, 1997, Contraction of the abdominal muscles associated with movement of the lower limb, Phys Ther, 77, 132, 10.1093/ptj/77.2.132 · DOI
  3. Dulin, 2004, Evaluation of abdominal wall strength after TRAM flap surgery, Plast Reconstr Surg, 113, 1662, 10.1097/01.PRS.0000117197.77201.14 · DOI
  4. Kumar, 2015, Efficacy of core muscle strengthening exercise in chronic low back pain patients, J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 28, 699, 10.3233/BMR-140572 · DOI
  5. Jensen, 2017, Abdominal wall reconstruction for incisional hernia optimizes truncal function and quality of life: a prospective controlled study, Ann Surg, 265, 1235, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001827 · DOI
  6. van Ramshorst, 2012, Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study, Am J Surg, 204, 144, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.01.012 · DOI
  7. Holihan, 2015, Adverse events after ventral hernia repair: the vicious cycle of complications, J Am Coll Surg, 221, 478, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.026 · DOI
  8. Kerr, 2013, Patient-centered performance management: enhancing value for patients and health care systems, JAMA, 310, 137, 10.1001/jama.2013.6828 · DOI
  9. Evans, 2018, The National Institutes of Health patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): a view from the UK, Patient Relat Outcome Meas, 9, 345, 10.2147/PROM.S141378 · DOI
  10. Black, 2016, Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services and better societies, Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil, 25, 1103
  11. Khalil, 2020, Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global health short forms demonstrate responsiveness in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 35, 1540, 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.032 · DOI
  12. Lagendijk, 2020, Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures into breast surgical oncology: advancing toward value-based care, Oncologist, 25, 384, 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0355 · DOI
  13. Aho, 2016, Patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, Am Surg, 82, 550, 10.1177/000313481608200618 · DOI
  14. Mier, 2018, Preoperative pain in patient with an inguinal hernia predicts long-term quality of life, Surgery, 163, 578, 10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.055 · DOI
  15. Lawrence, 1997, Quality of life in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 79, 40
  16. Quail, 2017, Perioperative gabapentin improves patient-centered outcomes after inguinal hernia repair, MilMed, 182, e2052
  17. Heniford, 2008, Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs, J Am Coll Surg, 206, 638, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.025 · DOI
  18. Francis, 2016, Checklist to operationalize measurement characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures, Syst Rev, 5, 129, 10.1186/s13643-016-0307-4 · DOI
  19. Cheng, 2017, Qualitative methods and patient-reported outcomes: measures development and adaptation, Int J Qual Methods, 16, 160940691770298, 10.1177/1609406917702983 · DOI
  20. Lasch, 2010, PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation, Qual Life Res, 19, 1087, 10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Heniford, 2018, Carolinas comfort scale as a measure of hernia repair quality of life: a reappraisal utilizing 3788 internaional patients, Ann Surg, 267, 171, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002027 · DOI
  22. Squitieri, 2017, The role of patient-reported outcome measures in value-based payment reform, Value Health J Int Soc Pharmaoeconomics Outcomes Res, 20, 834, 10.1016/j.jval.2017.02.003 · DOI
  23. Alrubaiy, 2014, Assessing patient reported outcome measures: a practical guide for gastroenterologists, United Eur Gastroenterol J, 2, 463, 10.1177/2050640614558345 · DOI
  24. Terwee, 2007, Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires, J Clin Epidemiol, 60, 34, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Poulose, 2020, Abdominal core health–a needed field in surgery, JAMA Surg, 155, 185, 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5055 · DOI
  26. Feng, 2019, Early repair of ventral incisional hernia may improve quality of life after surgery for abdominal malignancy: a prospective observational cohort study, Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg, 23, 81, 10.1007/s10029-018-1863-4 · DOI
  27. Alkhatib, 2020, Outcomes of transversus abdominis release (TAR) with permanent synthetic retromuscular reinforcement for bridged repairs in massive ventral hernias: a retrospective review, Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg, 24, 341, 10.1007/s10029-019-02046-z · DOI
  28. 2002, Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria, Qual Life Res, 11, 193, 10.1023/A:1015291021312 · DOI
  29. Colavita, 2012, Prospective, long-term comparison of quality of life in laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair, Ann Surg, 256, 714, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182734130 · DOI
  30. Bodart, 2019, Perceived burden of completion of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials: results of a preliminary study, Ther Innov Regul Sci, 53, 318, 10.1177/2168479018788053 · DOI
  31. Atkinson, 2019, Perceptions of response burden associated with completion of patient-reported outcome assessments in oncology, Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res, 22, 225, 10.1016/j.jval.2018.07.875 · DOI
  32. Schoen, 2018, Software for administering the national cancer institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events: usability study, JMIR Hum Factors, 5, e10070, 10.2196/10070 · DOI
  33. Lucas, 2018, Development of an eHealth system to capture and analyze patient sensor and self-report data: mixed-methods assessment of potential applications to improve cancer care delivery, JMIR Med Inform, 6, e46, 10.2196/medinform.9525 · DOI
  34. Gandrup, 2019, Using health information technology to support use of patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology, Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 45, 257, 10.1016/j.rdc.2019.01.007 · DOI
  35. Cohen, 1992, A power primer, Psychol Bull, 112, 155, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Sears, 2012, A guide to interpreting a study of patient-reported outcomes, Plast Reconstr Surg, 129, 1200, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2e21 · DOI

Cited by

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Patel, V., Cunning, J. R., Rios-Diaz, A. J., Mauch, J. T., Nathan, S. L., Messa, C. A., Whitely, C. B., Kozak, G. M., Broach, R. B., & Fischer, J. P.
Affiliations
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2020-12-29
Volume
276
Issue
6
Pages
1039-1046
ISSN
0003-4932
Cited by
28
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Assessment of the Abdominal Hernia‐Q (AHQ)‐Patient Burden, Reliability, and Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life in Hernia Repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0000000000004713
The paper
Patel, V., Cunning, J. R., Rios-Diaz, A. J., Mauch, J. T., Nathan, S. L., Messa, C. A., Whitely, C. B., Kozak, G. M., Broach, R. B., & Fischer, J. P. (2022). Prospective Assessment of the Abdominal Hernia‐Q (AHQ)‐Patient Burden, Reliability, and Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life in Hernia Repair. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004713

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.